TPO 6- integrated essay

Essay topics:

TPO 6- integrated essay

The reading passage states that communal online encyclopedias, which are the same as traditional and printed ones, although are written and edited by a large internet community, present a lot of issues. However, the professor casts doubts on the points made in the reading.

First, considering the article these encyclopedias often have academic errors, since the editor may not have complete and rigor information on the subject. In contrast, the professor in the lecture contradicts the idea and further explains that this criticism is hardly fair because there never is an academic source that is close to perfect. On the contrary to the traditional encyclopedias wherein errors remain for decades, at least it is easy to correct errors in online encyclopedias.

Second, the reading claims that these encyclopedias are the best opportunity for malicious users to mess with the information in them. on the contrary, the professor in the lecture refutes the information presented in the reading and makes the point that online encyclopedias use strategies to recognize malicious changes. first, they put crucial information in the read-only format that cannot be changed by anyone. second, they acquire special editors to eliminate changes that are obviously malicious.

Third, the author in the reading passage puts forward the idea that in some sense since such encyclopedias are edited by the whole community, some subjects may seem much more important than they really are. On the other hand, the speaker contradicts the idea and adds that traditional encyclopedias have eliminated space, but space is no longer a problem in online ones. thus, the traditional ones did not reflect the great range of interest among the people. The great variety of online encyclopedia reflects its diversity, which is its strongest advantage.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...s to mess with the information in them. on the contrary, the professor in the lect...
^^
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...ategies to recognize malicious changes. first, they put crucial information in the re...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 418, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Second
...ormat that cannot be changed by anyone. second, they acquire special editors to elimin...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 372, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
... is no longer a problem in online ones. thus, the traditional ones did not reflect t...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, may, really, second, so, third, thus, at least, in contrast, on the contrary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 288.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38888888889 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88631696411 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565972222222 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1894734287 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.384615385 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.