Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Since the dawn of civilizations, leadership has played a significant role in people's lives. No one can neglect the fact that most of the historical occurrences have happened by powerful leaders. In this regard, there is a long-standing discussion among individuals whether one can learn the essential skills to be a thriving leader or not. Some people may hold the view that leadership comes naturally and one cannot learn to be a leader, while some other may take an opposite viewpoint. I personally strongly believe that humankind could learn and teach leadership like other skills. I will elaborate on this through three reasonable pieces of evidence.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that it would be no exaggeration if someone says that leadership like other skills contains other skills such as making a relationship, having enough self-confidence and management. In this regard, one who learn all of these skills and expertise can be successful in leadership. Take Karlos Keyrosh- the coach of Iran national soccer team- as an example. I recently read an interview with him, which show that he attended different training courses about elevating self-confidence and various techniques for making stronger relationships or numerous strategies to manage a group of people more efficient. Therefore, by taking these educational and informative courses, he could easily improve his leadership skills and optimized the performance of football players.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that the economic well-being of people who live today developed thanks to the industrial developments. Additionally, no one can reject the fact that the quantity of companies who are working through these stiff competition has been increased during the last centuries. Therefore, these companies need to have more reliable and applicable leaders to launch new products and gain more profits. Meanwhile, the more successful companies are developing their companies, the more professional and thriving leaders we need to guide these companies. Although nothing has changed in the evolution process of a baby, the number of leaders has been increased significantly. for instance, I work in a computer software developing companies. my boss needs to compete with lots of companies to develop new apps. Although he had experienced different risks and even sometimes loses, I could watch his developing in being a more better leader.
In brief, one can logically draw the conclusion that leadership does not seem to intrinsically from the impacts of different courses in developing this skill and developing leaders abilities in high-pressure situations. However, there would be another reasons and examples, challenging these reasons, not mentioned above. All in all, it is highly recommended that a survey can assess is this argument is accurate or not profoundly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 713, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...aders has been increased significantly. for instance, I work in a computer software...
^^^
Line 5, column 779, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: My
...computer software developing companies. my boss needs to compete with lots of comp...
^^
Line 5, column 958, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...I could watch his developing in being a more better leader. In brief, one can logically ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, even so, for instance, in brief, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2442.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 447.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46308724832 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07318230003 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557046979866 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 753.3 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2660072773 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3181818182 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22727272727 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17218237243 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505113013156 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432626198447 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110264246096 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050748950328 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.