Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict.
In today’s convoluted world, it is generally apparent the fact that the rules are the cornerstone of managing every society. In this regard, there is a controversial debate among individuals about the strictness of regulations for younger generations than past. Some people may hold the view that modern societies require the youth to follow stringent laws, while, some others take the opposing viewpoint. I firmly believe that youngsters feel more freedom thanks to the fact that they are expected not to obey strict rules. In the following, I will elaborate upon my standpoint through two pieces of evidence.
The first exquisite point to mention is that rules are developing to become more useful than strict. It is generally agreed that when societies force young generations to follow more strict rules, they will withstand new regulations. Moreover, it would be no exaggeration if someone says that legislators generally know that strict rules have a devastating impact on the society. Consequently, they attempt to pass regulations that are more achievable than strict. By way of illustration, take my personal experience as an example. When I studied at primary school, parents required students to study and compete with their classmates in order to attain satisfactory grades. However, the defects of employing grades as an indicator of representing the success of children’s education give rise to devising new rules for investigating the performance of young students. In this system of education, new laws do not restrict children’s creativity, so students have more opportunity to become educationally flourishing.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that young people are more cognizant of their rights thanks to modern ways of communication which make it arduous to legislate tough rules against them. No one can neglect the fact that modern societies spend more times reading multifarious books and watching more movies. Besides, having access to global internet paves the way for informing peoples. In other words, technological devices opened doors for enhancing the level of literacy and active thinking. Therefore, the youth will request the freedom that they watch in other countries and do not permit society in order to force them to follow strict rules. According to a recent study that has been published in Time magazine, researchers investigated the relationship between protesters’ age and the number of them in more than 23 protests in California. The results of this study revealed that more than 80 percent of protesters against strict rules were young persons under age 25. Scholars pointed out that applying social media application such as Twitter as the main source of grasping news has given the youngsters the opportunity to be the majority part of these days’ protests against strict rules.
- Agree/DisagreeGovernments shoud spend money to improve internent access than to improve public transportaion 76
- Agree/DisagreeIn the past young depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them, today young people are better to make decisions about their own lives 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements. Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much moreeffectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 90
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.•Wait until the class or meeting 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 30.3222958057 201% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2424.0 1373.03311258 177% => OK
No of words: 449.0 270.72406181 166% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3986636971 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.04702891845 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9788949478 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 145.348785872 176% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570155902004 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 747.9 419.366225166 178% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5347130478 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.428571429 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.380952381 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90476190476 7.06452816374 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 4.33554083885 254% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213151843327 0.272083759551 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571529219189 0.0996497079465 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551243548636 0.0662205650399 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149826931734 0.162205337803 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0212348344708 0.0443174109184 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.8541721854 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 63.6247240618 214% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.