Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to read or watch the news
presented by people whose views are similar to your own than by people whose views are different
from yours.
Throughout our history, being informed has been playing a significant role in people’ lives. With this in mind, the galloping rate of developing mass media has overwhelmed individuals with various opinions. In this regard, there is a controversial debate between people about how individuals should choose their sources of news. Some people may hold the view that individuals should follow the story from sources which are similar to their views, while, some others take an opposite viewpoint. I strongly contend that it would be beneficial for people to follow the latest news from various sources even sources which have different ideas. In the following, I will elaborate upon my standpoint through two pieces of evidence.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that those who listen and read news from various sources of information would have the opportunity to receive an extensive range of knowledge. Moreover, it is generally agreed that following opponent sources of news not only can consolidate people’s information but also broaden their horizons. Take a personal experience as an example, when I studied in a primary school, I used to be extremely strict about my religion. In other words, I neither listened to people who thought different nor spoke with them. As a result, I used to be a narrow-minded man. Attending at Tehran University gave me the chance to live with people from various religions in the same dorm room. So, this atmosphere enabled us to both discuss our beliefs and know more about our opinions. Although, at the begging of our meetings we had many conflicts, we could give a hand to each other to develop our knowledge of different ideas. Consequently, when I remember those memories, I found that hadn’t I listened to my classmate’s views, I would not have got familiar with numerous religions.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that reading and listening to news and views thinking different us paves the way for socializing. No one can neglect the fact that while people follow opponent opinions, they open doors to other people’s ideas. Thus, the majority of human kinds can take full advantages of this setting for making new friends and extending their relationships. According to a recent study that was published in Time Magazine, researchers evaluated the behavior of those audiences who are Republican but follow the Fox news programs. Fox news is a Democratic TV channel that in fact criticizes the opinions of Republicans. The noteworthy results of the study show that group of Republicans are well-coming to Democrats and even could establish some friends with them.
In brief, one can logically conclude that following opponent news sources can benefit him more regarding broadening people’s horizons and extending his network. However, there are other reasons, challenging these reasons, not mentioned above. All in all, it is highly recommended that a survey can assess the profound results of this phenomenon on people’s morale.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 517, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...aluated the behavior of those audiences who are Republican but follow the Fox news prog...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 598, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (TV) must be used with a third-person verb: 'channels'.
Suggestion: channels
...s programs. Fox news is a Democratic TV channel that in fact criticizes the opinions of...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, thus, well, while, even so, in brief, in fact, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2560.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 487.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25667351129 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69766713281 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93595006032 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548254620123 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 786.6 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2052373751 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.666666667 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2916666667 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.20833333333 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152772080325 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435828100249 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396140246236 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0994604585781 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210834275304 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 86.8835125448 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.