Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
By and large, people have played a significant role in the future of societies until now. Meanwhile people of different ages inclined to make decisive decisions for the future of the society as they can. In this regard, there is a long-study discussion among individuals whether young people impact on the important decisions that determine the future of the society like others or not. Some people may hold the view that young people play a decisive role in the future of their society while some others take an opposite viewpoint. I personally believe that young people influence on the important decisions that determine the future of the society as a whole even more than before. I will elaborate upon my standpoints through three reasonable pieces of evidence.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that those who live nowadays are more informed about their circumstances and happenings of the worlds thanks to the mass media and social media apps such as Facebook, telegram, WeChat, to name but a few. Therefore, it would be no exaggerations if someone says, the more someone knows about his/her environment, the more he/she would cooperate on it. Consequently, this cooperation opens doors for influencing the future of society as a whole. According to a recent study that has been published in Time magazine, people's ordinary knowledge about various occurrences through whole over the world elevated due to News channels. This research has shown that protestors made a remarkable role in Trump decisions about immigration issues while most of them were young people and could share the latest news of victims on the net. Undoubtedly, this phenomenon paves the way for influence as much as possible.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that the economic well-being of people has been developed thanks to the industrial development. It is generally agreed that those who live nowadays have a better financial situation than those who live past. Additionally, according to Maselo pyramid hypotheses, improving human economic status can give them to the opportunity to get more involved in their social problems and issues. For instance, when I was a young child, people who lived in my city --Naein used to suffer from poverty and medical care’s shortages. Thus they didn't have enough time and energy to spend time thinking about social problems. However, industrial developments changed people's ways of thinking and enabled them to wrestle with these dilemmas.
In brief, one can logically draw the conclusion that today young people not only are involved in their social problems but also play a crucial role on the future on society as well in terms of devaluing sharing information infrastructures and boosting people’s economic. However, there are other reasons and examples, challenging theses reasons and not mentioned above. All in all, it is generally recommended that a survey can assess the significant position of young children on the future of the community.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...e in the future of societies until now. Meanwhile people of different ages inclined to ma...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 574, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...erty and medical care's shortages. Thus they didnt have enough time and energy ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 584, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...edical care's shortages. Thus they didnt have enough time and energy to spend ti...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in brief, such as, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2538.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 485.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23298969072 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69283662038 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79749519775 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536082474227 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 810.0 618.680645161 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1505321597 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.857142857 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0952380952 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274996149768 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840009966588 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717984979186 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162057670411 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0894048939647 0.0645574589148 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 86.8835125448 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.