Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is impossible to always be completely honest with your friends
Throughout history, relationships have been playing a crucial role in people’s lives. Various kinds of characteristics may pose a threat to a relationship or make it stronger. In this regard, there is a long-standing discussion among individuals about the possibility of being always honest with your friends. Some people may hold the view that being honest all the time is not possible, while some others take the opposite viewpoint. I strongly contend that being completely honest seems to be impossible. In the following, I will elaborate upon my standpoint through two pieces of evidence.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that living a hectic lifestyle could be the main significant obstacle of being completely honest. It is generally agreed that people who live nowadays need to spend more hours of their life in their work offices. Moreover, no one can neglect the fact that people are more overwhelmed with various kinds of technological devices. Therefore, those who live these days have a tendency to spend fewer times with their friends and relatives. In this circumstance, the majority of human generation is less inclined to make a description of their trivial parts of their lives and might not tell the truth. Take a personal experience as an example; my friend—Ali—and I have accustomed to each other for more than 4 years. Although we are intimate friends, we spend fewer hours with each other due to different working places. Our weekly meeting is such a great time for speaking about our happenings during the last week. However, lack of enough time prevents us from being completely honest and we need to overlook lots of details of our experiences.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that being completely honest all the time can lead to various conflictions. No one can neglect the fact that different friends think differently so, they react to different situations variously. When someone attempts to avoid telling white lies in a relationship, by means of which he or she may cause a catastrophic situation. According to a recent study that has been published In Time magazine, even though being loyal can pave the way for having a strong marriage, more than 25 percent of divorces are attributable to another phenomenon. Statistics show that wives that try to be completely honest with their husbands might spark diversified conflicts thanks to their sentimentality.
In brief, one can logically draw the conclusion that being completely honest not only seems to be impossible in this modern lifestyle with a galloping pace but also may produce quarrels between family members. However, there are other reasons and examples, challenging these ideas not mentioned above. All in all, it is highly recommended that a survey can assess the possibility of this argument.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, in brief, speaking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2374.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 460.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16086956522 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9659408782 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560869565217 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 728.1 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.772933437 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.217391304 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26086956522 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250234896033 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683722399161 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741797125917 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156234150933 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224156024937 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.