Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Historically, people tend to establish and develop their relationships with different kinds of people. There are numerous merits for making a friend. In this regard, there is a controversial debate among individuals about the relationship between the closeness of friendship and having joyful moments with our friends. Some people may hold the view that the intimacy of friendship play a crucial role in enjoying from the relationship, while, some others take the opposite viewpoint. I firmly believe people who maintained their friendships for longer times enjoy their relationships more. In the following, I will elaborate upon my standpoint through two pieces of evidence.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that the more people are close to each other, the more they would be supportive, which paves the way for having quality times in a relationship. It is generally agreed that people who spend more time with each other are more cognizant of the problems and difficulties of their friends. Moreover, they have an excellent knowledge of each other's weaknesses and strengths. As a result, people who face trouble can account for their intimate friends more. Take a personal experience as an example, when I studied at Tehran University, I had the opportunity of living in dorm rooms due to the reason that I studied far away. In other words, living in dorm rooms provide me the opportunity to spend most of my time with one of my classmates. In this circumstance, we resolved most of the mathematical problems with each other. Therefore, we knew each others' capabilities significantly. As a result, this phenomenon assisted us in meeting deadlines effectively thanks to the fact that we helped each other by carrying out our assignments.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that spending an extended period with our friends can enable us to deepen our relationships. No one can neglect the fact that those who spend more time with each other not only share more information with each other but also look at different issues in the same way. In fact, having friends for an extended period can make their line of thoughts parallel. According to a recent study that has been published in Time magazine, researchers investigated the relation between hobbies of more than 320 employees in a developing software corporation. The results revealed that most of the employees who worked in the same room had similar outdoor activities. Additionally, they inclined to spend their leisure times with roommates because they have the same interests and can enjoy more with each others' company.
In brief, one can logically conclude that spending an extended period with close friends can open doors for having more happy time regarding its capability to make friends more supportive and deepening their relationships by sharing interests. However, there are other reasons and examples, challenging these reasons, not mentioned above. All in all, it is highly recommended that a survey can assess the profound results of having intimate friends than making new friends on people's morale.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 841, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
... interests and can enjoy more with each others company. In brief, one can logically...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, while, in brief, in fact, as a result, in other words, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2613.0 1977.66487455 132% => OK
No of words: 502.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20517928287 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7334296765 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86732558442 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505976095618 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 806.4 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1009369746 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.875 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234385770384 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755562167073 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535976730728 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166852117611 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264911448566 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 86.8835125448 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.