Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Since the dawn of civilization, people are more concerned about their career. Thanks to the fact that people spend most of their time in their work offices, job satisfaction plays a crucial role in their lives. In this regard, there is a long-standing discussion among individuals about different factors that positively impact on employee’s satisfaction. Some people may hold the view that workers who do various kinds of tasks during their workday are more satisfied than people who deal with a similar specified task. I strongly contend that workers with numerous and different duties are more satisfied with their jobs. In the following, I will elaborate upon my standpoint through two pieces of evidence.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that coping with various tasks during a work day paves the way for being more prosperous. It is generally agreed that employees that deal with numerous kinds of tasks need to apply their skills more than other workers. Therefore, they can utilize their knowledge in their problems that enable them for boosting their self-confidence. Take a personal experience as an example; when I studied in primary school, I used to work as a simple waiter in a cafe. So, the most remarkable task that was defined for me was cleaning the floor. Although this task was so simple to deal with, lack of exciting moments makes me feel unuseful. Thus, I changed my position to a barista man for serving coffee for people. Even though I need to work faster with a same range of salary, I had to apply my abilities and utilize my creativity to making innovations in different coffee orders which helped me to find a decent job next year. Hadn’t I done different tasks in those days, I would not have had the opportunity to climb my career ladder years later.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that people who wrestle with various kinds of tasks during their work hours would have the chance to get more familiar with different individuals. Needless to say that visiting various people in a day not only paves the way for socializing with them but also opens doors for making more friends which can positively impact on people's expectations. According to a recent study that has been published in Time magazine, those who carry out different tasks are more well-coming to people. In this research, the scientists observed the behavior of more than 230 volunteers in their work offices. Statistics show that individuals who do more than 3 or 4 tasks in their working hours have the chance to meet more than 4 or 5 people. Moreover, no one casts doubts on the fact that people inclined to set up a relationship with his or her coworkers. Consequently, the results of this study clearly show that the more tasks someone deals with, the more satisfied he or she will be.
In brief, one can logically draw the conclusion that doing numerous tasks in a work day impacts on people's satisfaction in terms of fostering their knowledge, self-confidence and extending their friends networks. However, there are other reasons and examples, challenging these reasons, not mentioned above. All in all, it is highly recommended that a survey can assess the compare the multi-tasking workers with mono-tasking in employees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 978, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'did'?
Suggestion: did
...d a decent job next year. Hadn't I done different tasks in those days, I would ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 26.0 11.0286738351 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2732.0 1977.66487455 138% => OK
No of words: 550.0 407.700716846 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96727272727 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84273464058 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77059172604 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 278.0 212.727598566 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505454545455 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 819.9 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8415662343 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.28 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242608089257 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710932982514 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062026908985 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160042533827 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0169022987343 0.0645574589148 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 86.8835125448 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.