Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In recent years, the meaning of the word "reward" changes significantly in the human resource area. Workers more consider how the job is and how they can work in the office more than how much their salary is. In my personal opinion, I agree with the statement that workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks during office hours than when they do similar jobs all day long. By arguing below three ideas -- Monotonous work is boring for labors, Workers can improve their operation by knowing broad types of tasks, and experience of a variety of tasks grant workers to the better career, I will show that my idea is reasonable.
First of all, doing only one type of task during all their office hours is boring. Doing similar jobs all day long, workers don't have enough time to fresh their mind. When I was a university student, I did a port security guard as a part-time job. All of my posts were sitting in the gate for 7 hours, and when trailers came, I checked the security pass and opened the gate. This job was well-paid but too menial for me to tolerate. Therefore, I definitely think that monotonous work is unsatisfaction for workers.
Also, workers can improve their quality and efficiency of work by knowing many types of tasks in the office. Office operation is a combination of several small tasks. If workers do only one kind of skill, they have no chance to know others' jobs beyond their job description. In general, the misunderstanding or miscommunication of each worker can affect inefficient operation. For example, sometimes, there are many documents that nobody will read in the office, because of miscommunications between divisions. On the other hand, if workers know the full operation in the office by trying several component tasks, they can make communication in the office more smoothly and efficiently. Therefore, workers can avoid some needless jobs.
Finally, workers can improve their skills and acquire many types of expertise for promotion. Of course, the workers who have broad experience are easy to promote. Because the managers or supervisors have to understand the job of their subsidiaries. Even if they can't promote in their current workplace, they can make their broad experience to change their position.
In conclusion, some workers may want to menial task because they don't need to study or learn many things, however, for the above reasons, I strongly agree with the statement idea, workers are more satisfied by doing a wide variety of tasks during the workday than by doing single tasks for all day.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...re than how much their salary is. In my personal opinion, I agree with the statement that worker...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 318, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...rkers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks during office hours than...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...oing similar jobs all day long, workers dont have enough time to fresh their mind. W...
^^^^
Line 13, column 263, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...job of their subsidiaries. Even if they cant promote in their current workplace, the...
^^^^
Line 17, column 66, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...rs may want to menial task because they dont need to study or learn many things, how...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, in general, kind of, of course, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2167.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 436.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97018348624 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76044444185 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490825688073 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 675.0 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8927386462 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8181818182 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13636363636 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361962754159 0.236089414692 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104940646078 0.076458572812 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142742952367 0.0737576698707 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233891997449 0.150856017488 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115972924914 0.0645574589148 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.