Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
--Interrupt and correct the mistake right away
--Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader
--Say nothing
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In the discussion in the office, we occasionally met the situation that our leader or boss is saying something wrong. In this case, in my personal opinion, we should wait until the meeting is over and then talk to the leader. Through talking three ideas, --mistake may not affect the conference itself, I also misunderstanding the point, and I may embarrass the leader by correcting mistakes in front of everyone, I will show I idea is reasonable.
First of all, you also misunderstand what the leader is saying. Generally speaking, the leader of the discussion prepared the meeting topic better than you, one of the attendance. When you think some information or logic structure is incorrect, this can mistake from a lack of knowledge or expertise. In that case, your interruption is meaningless, or even annoyance for other colleagues. Therefore, what you have to do is confirm the point where you concern after the meeting with the meeting leader.
Second, this mistake may be minor and may not affect the conclusion of the discussion. If the leader made mistakes in the debate, the conclusion or to-do task of the meeting might not be affected. In this case, the interruption of the conference is a loss of time. Therefore, you should wait until the end of the session and assess whether the mistake is severe or not. Then, if the error is so colossal to mislead the conclusion, you have to discuss it with the leader.
Finally, the leader considers that it is embarrassing to be interrupted and pointed out his own mistake. Being corrected their error in front of others is very uncomfortable for almost all people. If you do such a thing, it is tough for the leader to keep facilitating the discussion. Therefore, you should take priority to continue the discussion smoothly. And, after the meeting, you can talk with him directly and correct the point.
In conclusion, this is the topic that strongly depends on the person. I can understand others will do the other way. However, for the above reasons, I strongly consider that when I find the meeting leader says something incorrect, we should wait until the meeting end and the people are gone, and then, take time with the leader to talk about the point.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...ng something wrong. In this case, in my personal opinion, we should wait until the meeting is ov...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1854.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86614173228 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78269692088 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475065616798 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.9 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8459191297 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2857142857 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.85842293907 337% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324626511163 0.236089414692 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0935466026792 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621449418675 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192308283744 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030453704808 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.