Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more
effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Since the dawn of civilization, education has been playing a crucial role in people's life. Although the benefits of applying team activity in work offices on developed remarkable advances, their efficiency in students' performance is a controversial topic. In this regard, there is a long-standing discussion among individuals whether students' efficiency will increase when they work with their classmates or when they work alone. Some people may hold the view that student's performance in a team mode will be increased while some others take an opposite viewpoint. I myself strongly believe that students should be required to work together in team mode in order to optimize their efficiency. I will elaborate upon my standpoints through three reasonable pieces of evidence.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that studying in a group provides the opportunity for students to not only discuss their misconceptions but also think about various problems from different aspects. Thus, pupils who study in this system of education would gain a comprehensive understanding of their studies. Take a personal experience and an example. When I studied at Tehran University as a Master student, my friends and I constitute a meeting for discussing different and most recent discoveries in our field. By so doing, we paved the way to recognize the applications of new discoveries in our country and gain a better understanding of their applications. Moreover, these weekly meeting has opened doors for dealing with various problems of our classmates. People devised their challenges in their thesis, and we tried to take the full advantages of numerous ideas and opinions to resolve their issues by representing the most beneficial and applicable solutions.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that it is generally agreed that people who are attending in group activities would have more passion and desire to wrestle with the proposed issue or problem. No one can neglect the fact that participating in team projects enables persons to push themselves out of their comfort zones to represent their best. According to a recent study that has been published in Time magazine, students that take team activities are more involved with the problem. Psychologically speaking, these students prefer to influence their classmates. Additionally, the research has revealed that students' performance would elevate near to 50 percent when they are asked to take group activity in co-educated schools. Needless to say, that they tried to engage their loved one attention by working harder and influence on other members of a team.
In brief, one can logically draw the conclusion that assigning projects to students would be more effective when they are working in a team than working alone in terms of increasing students’ concentration and attention and using the advantages of people's opinion about different aspects of a problem. However, there are other reasons and examples, challenging these reasons, not mentioned above. Considering everything, it is unanimously recommended that a survey can assess the profound results of this phenomenon on students' morale.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 466, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...one. Some people may hold the view that students performance in a team mode will be incr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 487, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a team mode" with adverb for "team"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...hold the view that students performance in a team mode will be increased while some others tak...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 626, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ionally, the research has revealed that students performance would elevate near to 50 pe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 525, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... profound results of this phenomenon on students morale.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, while, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2689.0 1977.66487455 136% => OK
No of words: 497.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41046277666 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02764823694 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535211267606 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 831.6 618.680645161 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8221052811 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.227272727 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5909090909 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22727272727 5.45110844103 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218851944482 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630129939944 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696136471907 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154148292177 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676990381496 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 154.0 86.8835125448 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.