It is cryptically clear that leader, who manage a group of people, is ana pivotal and inevitable part of not only our life but also almost every work in a daily basis group. Every group includes a team, who work on a project, a company, organization or even a country needs to be managed by someone. Without any manager who controls all of the process of reaching the group goal, successful will not come and they are liable to culminate with fail . Any society definitely has a leader who consults the people to execute desirable agendas. Besides, even when we are at school working on a group project, someone controls the budget and time of the project as a supervisor. Some people believe that these people are innately leaders. Whereas others believe that it is learnable to be a leader. Personally, I am in favor with the latter group for two legitimate reasons, which are detailed in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, leader must have some special characteristics such as wisdom, decisive a manager or leader has some adorable characteristic which are completely obtainable not innate. Although all of people cannot learn these special characteristics but some people can learn them during their lifetime. Some of these features are visionary, innovative, and decisive on their decision, making the best decision in crucial situations, and so on. It is obvious that these kind of characteristics can be learned. These traits are not innate personalities, which are not learnable. As a case in point, when I was working at a computer company, which was very reputable, three months ago, we had a manager who was good at making a good and decisive decision. When you check out her resume, It shows that she has a repudiate studies in some majors. Besides, she worked as an internship in some other companies. Being successful on all of her projects shows that had a considerable studying, instructor and teachers. It goes without saying, a leader who want to manage a group of people must be well-educated and be able to intellect others people which will comes if they work hard to learn anything is needed.you can one of those characteristic as being sociable. Based on some research, it is not innate. In other words, if someone is shy and is not sociable, it does not mean they cannot change. These people can change into a sociable person. To be more tangible, when I was teaching at university as a lecturer, one of my students was such people. She even was afraid of contributing in class conversation. I recommend her some advice, which was useful for her to be more sociable. At the end of semester, she was so sociable that she liked to solve any example, which I ask them to solve on the board.
Moreover, the world has been changed in every basis. If leadership is naturally, so in the volatile problem of the world, how they can make good decision, which has a considerable impact on multitude of people. To take a good decision they need to learn about a string and dependent series of events. It goes without saying, making good decision is not an innate things in people personalities.
To sum up, I completely agree with the idea that leadership does not come naturally. Not only do leader have to have some learnable characteristic but also they have to make some decision, which needs to learn some other things. Every society should select someone who can make good decision in not only good condition but also bad situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 427, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...that these people are innately leaders. Whereas others believe that it is learnable to ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 299, Rule ID: PRP_MD_CD_IN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can use one' or 'can be one'?
Suggestion: can use one; can be one
... not learnable. As a case in point, you can one of those characteristic as being sociab...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'thing'?
Suggestion: thing
..., making good decision is not an innate things in people personalities. To sum up, I ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, moreover, so, whereas, such as, in other words, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1860.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 389.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78149100257 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75884465351 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511568123393 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2487887369 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.5 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2083333333 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1455414983 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404978354367 0.076458572812 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494914521729 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0841746991397 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028711046399 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.