Do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
It is more important to keep your old friend than it is to make new friend,
Nowadays, having a close relationship with different person could have some positive consequences like assurance of having kind person for contributing in intricate predicaments. some member of a community holds the view that maintaining old friends is more vital compared to making new friends. However, other may believe that having more and more friends will be very better, and making new relationship with a variety of different person will be more helpful. In my perspective, the former idea is true. my reasons in order to justify my opinion are manifold, two of the most conspicuous of which will be explored in the following essay.
To commence with, one of the most noteworthy points of this claim is related to this importance that the determined time needing for being convenient with one`s friend could be very long, so people must pay much more attention to their previous friends. In other words, since the presence of some loyal and close friend in each individual`s life has been scientifically proved, and also each person undoubtedly is more convenient with his or her old friend, devoting time in order to reinforce the basis of relation with old friend will be more lucrative and impressive.
Second and equally exquisite point of this assertion is about this fact that almost always there will be huge amount of risks in making new friend. To shed more lights on this matter, consider a situation that for filling the room of your old friend you decide to make a new friend. since all person, regarding to his or her personality, thoroughly know that they cannot tolerate all person with each kind of moral characteristics, in order to make a friendly and constructive friendship, maybe they must wait for a long time for finding their favorite friends. Furthermore, for a specific kind of person calling introvert on behalf of psychologists, finding new person as a friend could be very annoying. so, generally speaking, if each individual decides to make new friends in comparison to keeping his or her old friend, he or she must accept the immense risks of this decision.
All in all, regarding to aforementioned arguments, we may draw the conclusion that maintaining old friends and dedicating more time for them could be more beneficial for people from diverse kind of aspects such as, reducing the time devoting to find a person suiting with our characteristics and also declining a huge rate of negative risks that making new friends have naturally, especially for introvert person.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...contributing in intricate predicaments. some member of a community holds the view th...
^^^^
Line 1, column 508, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: My
...y perspective, the former idea is true. my reasons in order to justify my opinion ...
^^
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Since
...friend you decide to make a new friend. since all person, regarding to his or her per...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 707, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...son as a friend could be very annoying. so, generally speaking, if each individual...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, regarding, second, so, kind of, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2114.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06954436451 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90880864899 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496402877698 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 648.9 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.1344086022 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 95.1122040589 48.9658058833 194% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.615384615 100.406767564 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0769230769 20.6045352989 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334254048736 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14319082766 0.076458572812 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0983953702947 0.0737576698707 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22049218686 0.150856017488 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464722202559 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 11.7677419355 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.1575268817 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.72 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.0537634409 147% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.