Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Education is one of the most important pillars of every society and the most influential elements in this regard are teachers who can either have positive or negative role. Throughout history, the role of teachers in society and the way that they effect on children minds is undeniable and scholars have always been conducting research on this issue. In this regard, a contentious question which arises is whether teachers play important role in society these days or in past decades. As a matter of fact, I believe that teachers nowadays are more valued and their presence is absolutely required rather than the past era. In what follows, I will explore my conspicuous reasons on this issue.
The first exquisite reason is that nowadays the importance of education is clear to every one and all parents know without teachers commitments, students are less likely to be successful. By advance in technology and living in the science-based world, the need to have a knowledgeable teacher is one of the crucial requirements. For instance, people put all their efforts to find better job in future by studying hard. If they do self-study, they will not get high quality knowledge which is needed for the difficult competition for job position in this era.
Another subtle point that is worthwhile to mention is that although the overall population in communities has been increased, the number of family members has been inclined and parents prefer to have less children to fulfill their requirements easily and provide them with better facilities. However, in the past decades, families were so crowded and parents did not pay attention to their education and school works. What I want to say is that parents nowadays focus more on their children's success and while it is believed widely that one of the most important ways to be successful is doing well in schools, thus, they pay more attention to their teachers since they are the most necessary resources of knowledge for them. For instance, imagine if teachers are not appreciated well, they are more likely to act weak in their classes and as a result, the students will not pave the way of success in school. An established survey conducted in my country indicates that nowadays the role of teachers in development of societies has increased about 30 percent which means that teachers' performance have been more effective rather than before. Which in turn means, the more the satisfaction in teachers, the better their effectiveness is.
To put it briefly, contemplating all factors, one soon realizes that the role of teachers has been more influential nowadays since every body has discovered the importance of teachers in developing societies and the effects that they have on children. In addition, the concentration of parents on children's success plays an important role to value the teachers since they convey the science and information to children. Consequently, I firmly recommend that in every societies, teachers should be appreciated and valued. Thanks to teachers, communities have progressed more these days. Don not you think it is convincing to respect them more?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun children is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...een inclined and parents prefer to have less children to fulfill their requirements ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1078, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...eased about 30 percent which means that teachers performance have been more effective ra...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 621, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'respecting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'convince' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: respecting
...ays. Don not you think it is convincing to respect them more?
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, consequently, first, however, if, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, as a matter of fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 15.1003584229 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.0752688172 297% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2629.0 1977.66487455 133% => OK
No of words: 514.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11478599222 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76146701107 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82165362346 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472762645914 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 807.3 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.0822909158 48.9658058833 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.45 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195566793413 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643487853401 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.033990726708 0.0737576698707 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125265166865 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334929304476 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.