Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Undoubtedly, teaching and learning are always an important aspect of human binges life. history of human life shows that in all centuries people tried to learn new things from masters who spent his/her lifetime on the specific field such as sailing, astronomy, martial art and other valuable things in their time. Although some people believe that teacher were more appreciated in the past others think that in modern life teacher have more value in society. Nevertheless, in My point of view teacher were more valued in the past societies.
This is very obvious that learning from a teacher was the first and last option and very popular in the past because there were no other ways to learn such as internet, TV, news or other technological devices to use for getting information. Today, students are not relying on teacher and they use lots of material and technology for learning their lessons. For instance, children in Japan use tablet and internet for their lesson and they are not dependent on their teachers. this independency causes them to less appreciate their teacher. And also teacher know that he/ she is just a person who guide students for efficient learning. Recent studies show that students in developed countries are more independent than other countries. This characteristic of students can interact with society view about teacher and cause loose of teaching importance and value.
In the past teaching was one of the best jobs and teacher had a high class-level in society and other people respect teachers because of his/ her knowledge and educational level and other persons were always less educated. This respect during history disappeared because of growing all persons’ educational level in society. Compering megacities with small villages can show this difference in respect to teacher. In small village people like teachers and they have a valuable place in their village.
The other important factor that shows teacher were more appreciated in the past is their salary or their income, which was high in the past. In the modern life other jobs have very high income instead of teacher’s income and financial situation. Although in some countries like Germany the importance of teaching is a lot but in my country teachers are in bad financial situations and they have second jobs like taxi driving and they are not satisfied about their life and jobs which can be effect educational system of country very badly.
in conclusion, the importance of teaching was more in the past than today and today people have less respect to teachers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: History
... important aspect of human binges life. history of human life shows that in all centuri...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 315, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nd other valuable things in their time. Although some people believe that teacher were m...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 477, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ey are not dependent on their teachers. this independency causes them to less apprec...
^^^^
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...onal system of country very badly. in conclusion, the importance of teaching ...
^^
Line 17, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ortance of teaching was more in the past than today and today people have less re...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2179.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 424.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1391509434 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61688318572 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457547169811 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 666.0 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6477348594 48.9658058833 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.684210526 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3157894737 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42105263158 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199529325379 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763782986839 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677105877338 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122192366099 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349436848494 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.