Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom
In the modern world, we are living in the conditions that freedom of speech and transparency are the primary aspects of our life. Although some may believe that teachers political or social points of view should not be revealed, In my perspective it helps build trust in the interactions and make common ground for supplementary discussions in the class. In what follows I will elaborate on the pros and cons of freely expressing the way of thinking politically and socially.
In the first place, it is crystal clear that a teacher's experience puts them in the dominant position. Students besides academic learning should learn social, and political aspects. If a teacher expresses his or her concerns politically, then students will find some common ground to participate in the issues that may be crucial for their future. Take the national election, for example, a hotly debate on the efficiency of the candidates would stimulate every student in the classroom to participate in the future elections which are significant for our countries decision-making process.
Moreover, bringing out the social issues would help students a lot in terms of improving social interactions. For instance, If a teacher openly discuss social disorders, and his or her perspective toward the problem, then the students' viewpoints will be broadened. In the case of increasing numbers of divorces, or increasing the crime rate among juveniles these challenging debates would increase the student's knowledge. On the other hand, if teachers remain silent about social issues, and just continuing regular educational matters like mathematics or history, then who will be responsible for such problems?
To sum up, teachers transparent social and political objectives could help students to obtain valuable experiences. It also provides an environment that ever pupil could take part in the hot debates besides common learnings. All in all, teachers are the most effective individuals that can help reduce the social and political concerns.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('hotly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('debate') instead of another adjective.
...ake the national election, for example, a hotly debate on the efficiency of the candidates wou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 403, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... challenging debates would increase the students knowledge. On the other hand, if teache...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, may, moreover, so, then, for example, for instance, to sum up, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 317.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41955835962 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96098753514 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583596214511 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4180757367 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.714285714 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.45110844103 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247833090208 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839152933664 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554131470354 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149398053541 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232726855691 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.