Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Teaching is always one of the most vital matters in society because, without education, no country can reach its goals at all. In my opinion, nowadays, people respect teachers more than what they did in the past. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explain in the following essay.
First of all, today's parents are more concerned about their children's high level of education. In the past, fewer parents thought their kids should go to college or university, but now everything changed from those days. The technology improvements led societies to have more academic degrees meaning to find a variety of job opportunities; you have to go to universities now. As a result, parents do their best to appreciate their kids' teachers to motivate them to teach better and provide more practical information for the children's future. For example, when my uncle was a twenty-year-old boy, his mother did not support him to go to college, and he still has a high school diploma. Although he did not have any upper education degree, he could find a good job. In contrast, I have my bachelor's degree, but I could not find my proper job not only because of the high rate of job demanding and fewer positions, but also more professional competitors who can adapt themselves easier with technologies than me. Consequently, this example can show the urge that parents feel these days for their kids' future, so they do whatever it takes to inspire their children's teachers to prepare them for their future more effectively.
Secondly, the government increases the salary of teachers every year, which means how teachers play a vital role in societies. In all developed countries, there is one fact in common, which is their effective system of education. That is, if a country wants to become successful in its path, it needs to encourage its new generation to become professional teachers in the future. The higher wages for teachers can be a good inspiration for individuals who are worried about the future of themselves as a teacher. Therefore, more people will like to become teachers in the future, and because they are not concerned about financial issues, they can merely concentrate on teaching their students better. The way that governments pay attention to bring up expert teachers implies how valuable teachers are currently, while in the past, teachers had low revenues, which were not enough for their significant expenses.
In conclusion, I believe that teachers are more valued in societies now. This is because the families are more enthusiastic about sending their kids to universities, and the governments devote more budget to raise teachers' incomes every year.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, i feel, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2250.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04484304933 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79893919343 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535874439462 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 697.5 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3838529875 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.421052632 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4736842105 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.36842105263 5.45110844103 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19891917141 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066456935844 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572641178658 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132510817616 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0141025392509 0.0645574589148 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.