Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In the twentieth century, Technology is not a fresh word to the people because it is somehow integrated with their life; such as computers, smartphones, and Internet access. So there has been no shortage of debate about the significance of technological innovations. However, the question is does it hassles children. Some people believe the emerging technology definitely threat to young adult intelligence. On the other hand, I personally feel technology certainly stronghold to the children to shine their thoughts for reasons I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, although children genius, they need technical support to practice their ideas. If a student working on the project, they should refer a lot of books to write the results and it is very hard to find necessary materials without internet. My Friend Alex is a good example of this. When we were doing a Master's at Ohio State University, He did research on Ancient Agriculture tools. Initially, he tried a lot to get the required information from textbooks and old magazines but he doesn't get enough data. But, he spends one hour in front of the computer; He acquired plentiful details. So, I feel technology never distract children creativity, In fact, it supports.
In addition, Technology prepares adulthood to challenge the real world, because it provides the necessary knowledge to face the consequences while practicing. In contemporary, if a student doesn't have an idea to operate a computer he can not survive in the class even he is brilliant because children now like smart work over hard work. My Uncles daughter is a good example of this. Even though she is just five years she knows how to order pizza online and she doesn't like to walk to the shop; it seems like children are smart now so there is a question about technology deviating their thoughts.
In conclusion, Although some people disagree with my idea by saying it damages children. Overall, it helps to face the challenges in real life and also supports their dreams comes true in their career.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 301, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'hassle'?
Suggestion: hassle
...tions. However, the question is does it hassles children. Some people believe the emerg...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 301, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'hassle'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: hassle
...tions. However, the question is does it hassles children. Some people believe the emerg...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 491, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...from textbooks and old magazines but he doesnt get enough data. But, he spends one hou...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...acticing. In contemporary, if a student doesnt have an idea to operate a computer he c...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...knows how to order pizza online and she doesnt like to walk to the shop; it seems like...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r dreams comes true in their career.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, while, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.0286738351 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 342.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00877192982 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8299033548 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602339181287 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4058523653 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1666666667 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05555555556 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155774550167 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477178132541 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321504300627 0.0737576698707 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0918490907779 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252657470388 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.