Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
In the contemporary world, there is no shortage of opinion on the usage of land. If I asked about land usage, I would consider human needs first. I fell this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, the human population has been increasing year by year and, they need land to survive. If people having require land, they would produce enough food to society. Consider my Father Alex, who is working as a farmer is a great example to illustrate this. He has been cultivating and supply paddy to the nearby cities for ten years. Image If he doesn't have enough land, he wouldn't produce rice to people. As a result, it is hard for them to survive without food. For this reason, I do believe that in the contemporary world, the land is important for people to survive.
In addition to food, people need land for shelter and Industries. As the population is growing, people need space to build their houses. Moreover, people also need land to establish industries. If society doesn't have industries, It is difficult for them to find jobs. Here I am exploring my personal experience as an example to explain this. when I was studying third grade, there were no industries near my town. The government allocated all the lands to the forest department to protect the animals. What's more, people struggled a lot for getting jobs and their basic needs. it is clear to see why I feel the land is important for humans than animals.
In conclusion, even though some people might disagree with my opinion, I personally feel, the land is more important for humans rather animals. People need more land to cultivate food for their survivance and their basic needs like houses and industries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 355, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...earby cities for ten years. Image If he doesnt have enough land, he wouldnt produce ri...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 383, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...Image If he doesnt have enough land, he wouldnt produce rice to people. As a result, it...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 580, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and is important for people to survive. In addition to food, people need land fo...
^^^
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...and to establish industries. If society doesnt have industries, It is difficult for th...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 343, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...perience as an example to explain this. when I was studying third grade, there were ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 503, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...rest department to protect the animals. Whats more, people struggled a lot for gettin...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 578, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...for getting jobs and their basic needs. it is clear to see why I feel the land is ...
^^
Line 3, column 655, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d is important for humans than animals. In conclusion, even though some people m...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...asic needs like houses and industries.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, so, third, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 301.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71428571429 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52735500405 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551495016611 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 618.680645161 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.6653406679 48.9658058833 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 67.5714285714 100.406767564 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3333333333 20.6045352989 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346026382795 0.236089414692 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105388793567 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847756808596 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220813573893 0.150856017488 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672302610421 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 11.7677419355 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 58.1214874552 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.1575268817 63% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.