benefits of the excessive taxes from smokers and unhealthy food products
The lecture and the reading both discuss whether or not the literature impact on current society. While the reading states that current studies reveal the young adult not show interest to read novels consequently its impact on their culture, tradition, and life of the literature. The lecture refutes this, saying that although it is true, it is less impact on today's generation.
First of all, the reading climes that reading enhances the intellectual stimulation like as language command, improve imagination and so on. since the people reading less, they are missing all important benefits of the reading. However, the lecture argues that in fact, it is true that youngsters have less interest in reading novels but high quality and well written scientific journals influence the adults and improve their knowledge. Furthermore, the professor states that they are well written and peer-reviewed article enhances intellectual stability as like as novels.
In addition, the reading makes the argument that people rather studying literature, they are reading the unauthenticated bookes and other kinds of entertainment programs such as watching television and watching music. The lecture counters this point by stating, of course, it is true that people spending less time with books but broadcasting and listening to music also improve the culture. According to the professor, listening to music and watch movies is not wasting because it reveals the many forms of experience speak directly.
Lastly, the reading passage argues that the situation of less reading books often impact many writers today. because they are not getting enough support and encouragement. The lecture refutes this clime by pointing out that it is true that there is less support but don't blame the audience because the writing style is difficult to understand. Moreover, the professor says the most of the writers are from the past so it is hard to understand current generation people and easy for old people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...he lecture and the reading both discuss whether or not the literature impact on current societ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 362, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...though it is true, it is less impact on todays generation. First of all, the reading ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 109, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
... books often impact many writers today. because they are not getting enough support and...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 266, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... is true that there is less support but dont blame the audience because the writing ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, moreover, so, then, well, while, in addition, in fact, of course, such as, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 9.8082437276 0% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 315.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32063492063 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71524163989 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530158730159 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9017635216 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.714285714 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7857142857 5.45110844103 216% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0168315336343 0.236089414692 7% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00752931291204 0.076458572812 10% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0186440363417 0.0737576698707 25% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0106072576249 0.150856017488 7% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0106826608639 0.0645574589148 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.