Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the fact that Friendship has a significance role in our social life. Humans are socialized animals and they have the tendency to communicate with their friends. Not all of people concur when this issue arises. Being cognizant to the logic behind those who endorse or repudiate the legitimacy of this contention, not having any biased perception, I presume that, it is vital, to keep our relation with long-term friends for being happy. Among a plentitude of reasons in support of this assertion, higher reliability and chances to support by long-lasting friends could be picked out for further analysis.
To commence with, a consensus has yet to be reached; however, regarding benefits of sharing our feelings and concerns with someone who found us easily, based upon the statistic of different general questionnaires in sundry counties, people are unanimously of the conviction that, ordinarily, since long term friends spend a long time with us in different situations, they are familiar with any aspects of our personality. In another hand, based on acquired information of these friend during many years, we can easily rely on these buddies and get their advice for solving our issues. A vivid example cab is given to shed light on what was elaborated above. The results of a study carried out by Rice University’s graduate students in psychology institute unveiled the fact that about 85% of student share their problems with reliable long lasting friends before their family.
In addition to the reason raised above; the opportunity to support these friends could also substantiate the justifiability of the claim made at the outset of this essay. In conjunction with public belief, as long as keeping long term friends, individuals could count on them and use their help and sympathies in challenging situations. As an example, one year ago, I established a small company and transferred its products to Japan. Although I should travel to Japan for selling, since I didn’t pass my military period, I didn’t get a passport. In this situation, one of the best my high school friend who study Ph.D. in this county, help me for sale. It is fair to say that: If he didn’t help me, my company failed.
Drawing upon the reasons, discreetly put, although my sophisticated people may prove the otherwise, as far as my personal perspective on the topic is concerned, I reiterate that happiness could be achieved by keeping our long lasting buddies. Not only they are more reliable but also it is helpful in critical situations.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, regarding, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2158.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05386416862 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89969843583 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587822014052 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.5283369096 48.9658058833 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.941176471 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1176470588 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.23529411765 5.45110844103 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184323629823 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507080309922 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393135999547 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106983906135 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411480352807 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 86.8835125448 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.