Since the dawn of civlization, friendship played vital roled in each society. Nowadays, many are adamant that a myriad of elements should be taken into consideration in order to examine its constructive and destructive facets of this issue. Due to its paramount importance, huge steps have been taken to elevate its role. Some people may hold the view that it is better to have much friend than less. However, some other take an opposide side and believe that life is not long enough to meet many person and less friend is best friend. From my vantage point, I concur with the letter group and think that number of friends is not important. The important one is qualifty of itself.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that it is hard to meet someone and believe them again and again. In our daily life, we meet with new persons that have different characters. Therefore, understanding someone who is new for you might be hard and harmful sometimes. A vivid example which can be given to shed light on the subject is one of my own experience. When I was in univesity in Germany, I used to live in domitory and have roomates. We could not be a friends since we have different personality. Therefore, I repeated one years, due to the fact It affect my classess.
Secondly, another reason which deserves some words to say is that there can be in a conflict, if you have a large group of friends. It is easy to manage couple of friends than larger one. Moreover, you can mantain your friendships if your friends have same personalitiy. Take my own example, I have 2 friends and we are friends until childhood. We like to do same things such as like playing same game or support same soccer team.
Lastly, althoug the aforementioned reasons are the fires one which cross the mind at first glance. They are by no means the only reasons available. In fact, there is another subtle point which must be borne in mind. The noteworth refreshingly intelligible statistic, reveal by a recent social reaseach conducted by a team of scientists who work at Harvard University, show that a significant percent of participated people think that having much friend and adding new ones damage healty since new friends damage mental healty.
To wrap it up, contemplanting all foresaid reasons, one soon relaize that less friend is best friends. I think everybody should have less but good friends. Morever, there many other reason which i could not write here such as
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 493, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun person seems to be countable; consider using: 'many people', 'many persons'.
Suggestion: many people; many persons
...ve that life is not long enough to meet many person and less friend is best friend. From m...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 468, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a friend' or simply 'friends'?
Suggestion: a friend; friends
...tory and have roomates. We could not be a friends since we have different personality. Th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 537, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one year', 'a year', or simply 'years'?
Suggestion: one year; a year; years
...rent personality. Therefore, I repeated one years, due to the fact It affect my classess....
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 567, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'affects'?
Suggestion: affects
... repeated one years, due to the fact It affect my classess. Secondly, another reaso...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed reasons are the fires one which cross the mind at first glance. They are by no...
^^
Line 9, column 196, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... Morever, there many other reason which i could not write here such as
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, lastly, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, i think, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2039.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75291375291 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64324152962 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550116550117 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.0971490306 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.4230769231 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07692307692 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142770378987 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0393450069159 0.076458572812 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0326650919405 0.0737576698707 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0787708640341 0.150856017488 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287547601449 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.