Both reading and listening discuss a problem which birds face. The reading states that people can protect the birds from injuries which stem from glasses and provide several solutions. However, the listening declares that these theories won’t work and refutes each author’s reasons.
The first solution which claimed by article is one way mirror glasses which transparent only one side. If the birds cannot see inside of buildings, they will not try to fly inside of them. Hence, they will not injury. On the contrary, the speaker reject it and asserts that one way glasses won’t stop bird to injury. They are bad as normal glasses. Birds will try to fly through one side glasses since they reflect other side such tree or another.
Secondly, the reading posits that the glasses which has colorful design might solve the problem. If people paint regular glasses, it may prevent the birds to fly in it. Conversely, the lecturer reject it and added that colorful glasses has also some negative outcome. The birds will see these glasses as open hole and will fly inside of it. Furthermore, these glasses also is not okay for people since they make inside darkness.
Finally, the article says that people keep the birds away from buildings by using magnetic field. They can use powerful electromagnets which product signals to prevent the birds. In contrast, the professor opposes that the idea of magnetic field will not figure out problems. Birds use these abilities when they migrate long distances but in short trip they use their eyes and reflect of shine.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, in contrast, in short, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1322.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04580152672 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31324161438 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549618320611 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.0190051218 49.2860985944 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.4444444444 110.228320801 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5555555556 21.698381199 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61111111111 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273378284049 0.272083759551 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887279181806 0.0996497079465 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567198570062 0.0662205650399 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157273762479 0.162205337803 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076157096587 0.0443174109184 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.3589403974 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.