From the dawn of civilization to modern times, transportation played crucial role in each society. A controversial question, recently raised about, cars will be more in the futures. There are many inventions which deserve to write some word but cars is critical and permanent than the others. I believe that the depend on vehicle will be more. I have several reasons such as transportation, environment friends cars and technologies.
First of all, the foremost reasons coming to my mind id that transportation. Firms which aim to attain their goal, use cars as a trade tools. This is mean, without cars world trade is nothing. Moreover, the population of World has skyrocketed compared to last decades. So, new population is the other name is extra consume. Hence, the need of using car will be more than expecting.
Secondly, another imperative reason to deserve some word to say is environment friends car with another word is green cars. The global warming has been had devastating effect on our mother nature. The government force companies to find nature friends solutions which do not harm nature . Furthermore, they decrease tax on development research. Even today there are many cars which work by electricity power.
Last but not least, last reason is increasing literacy rate. According to a research study conducted at MIT, by reputable team of scientist,(at MIT), it was found the car accident have correlation with literacy rate. The more educated driver is the less car accident. Since, literacy rate increased, car accident has dropped compared last decades. Although, driving car has some risk, people find the way which overcome and they are more aware of risks.
In conlusion, there are numerous reasons which can be persuasive enough to corroborate my view. Having analyzed the reasons above, one can conclude the need of cars are still significant. I highly recommend that goverment goverment should look for more nature friends way. I believe every country should find innovative solution to this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 397, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'formers'' or 'former's'?
Suggestion: formers'; former's
... cell phone, or computer. I am with the formers idea. I have several reasons such as tr...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 282, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...iends solutions which do not harm nature . Furhermore, they decrease tax on develo...
^^
Line 4, column 361, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun car seems to be countable; consider using: 'many cars'.
Suggestion: many cars
...elopment research. Even today there are many car which works by electricity. Last but...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 366, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'cars'?
Suggestion: cars
...ent research. Even today there are many car which works by electricity. Last but...
^^^
Line 6, column 265, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'surveys'' or 'survey's'?
Suggestion: surveys'; survey's
...ive car. For example, according to last surveys car accident has droped. Although, driv...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
... people find the way which overcome. Finally The reasons which I write above clearly...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, hence, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, such as, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 52.1666666667 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 320.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13125 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77147585335 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5875 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.1344086022 60% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.6996498437 48.9658058833 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 63.1538461538 100.406767564 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.3076923077 20.6045352989 60% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.88709677419 266% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233757048212 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066548492502 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103226838193 0.0737576698707 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126651777421 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.082001205125 0.0645574589148 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 58.1214874552 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.59 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.0537634409 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.