Since begining of this century un til today, TV played significant role in each society. Nowadays, many are adamant that should be taken into consideration in oder to examine its constructive and destructive facets of this matter. Some people may hold the view that it has positive effect on all society and boost their life qualitiy. On the contrary, others take an opposite view and think that this is as fallacy. There are much more adverse effect on the people. From my vantage point, I concur with the former group and the lines above will shed on light my viewpoint.
First of all, the first exquisite point to mention is that TV adds has effect on buying decisions. Companies aim to sell their product and reach potential and high profit by using TV adds. These adds have possitive effect on people and help to decide with product is better than others.
Secondly, approcahing this issue, apart from what mentioned above, there is another subtle point which must borne in mind. TV programms such as documentaries boost the knowledge of individuals. Expecially, some documentaries open people midns by telling realities about other cultures, life styles, traditions and geographies. Consequently, on the one hand they create a bridge between cultures, on the other hand they teach new ideas.
Lastly, although the aforementioned reasons are the first ones which cross the mind at first glance, there are by no means the only reasons available. TV gives information current events such as weather conditions, traffic of particular area or a concert. People decide to bring an umbrella by watching TV. Morever, the news is increase public awarness of a county.
To wrap up, one can conclude that TV shows has benefit than harmful effect. I think people watch TV and open their horizons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[2]
Message: Did you mean 'have borne' or 'bear'?
Suggestion: have borne; bear
...here is another subtle point which must borne in mind. TV programms such as documenta...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, apart from, i think, such as, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 299.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03678929766 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64185257311 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.638795986622 0.524837075471 122% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6194702753 48.9658058833 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.2631578947 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7368421053 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26315789474 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19698920678 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600361423012 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723727260381 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111952376311 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0724151526288 0.0645574589148 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.