Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Even though many people hold the notion that traveling independently without a guide would be more comfortable, and they would schedule their trip plan more flexibly, I subscribe to the view that vacation with the information and amenities provided by a tour guide is noticeably more productive and more pleasant. My reasons of support are managed as the following.
First of all, many of the most renowned landmarks, which are the most attracting places to tourists, have gained their fame due to the historical story behind them, and one can simply learn about the amazing events related to the landmarks as he is visiting them by a well-educated tour guide who is entirely aware of the locations' every little detail. For instance, consider the Taj Mahal as one of the most prominent historical places in India. The pleasure of visiting this place can be significantly enhanced if one learns about the tragic fact that the building was designed by a gentleman who couldn't dedicate it to his lover before her death since he didn't finish the construction in time; such a fact would be definitely mentioned by a trip guide.
Second of all, scheduling efficiently in order to visit all the worthwhile places in a city requires a great deal of effort and accurate time managing, so the stress and pressure resulted by it could ruin the vacation for the travelers. However, had one chosen to take his trip under the supervision of a tour guide, not only would he have saved himself much time, but also he could have visited as many amazing places as possible without going through much trouble since the tour guide would have planned everything so accurately. For example, on my trip to Paris with my family, the first place we chose to see was the Eiffel Tower. Unfortunately, the waiting line for its elevator was so long that we exhausted most of our time waiting in line. As a result, we missed all the other fascinating places we planned to visit. However, we could avoid wasting the day by selecting a later time to go to the Eiffel Tower since at late night the tower is much less crowded.
With all being said, whether the tour guide's knowledge of the landmarks might add to the significance of the vacation or his/her experience in managing a visiting plan would release us from the stress and effort of scheduling, one can conclude that the presence of a tour guide enriches the trip profoundly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...support are managed as the following. First of all, many of the most renowned ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 600, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...uilding was designed by a gentleman who couldnt dedicate it to his lover before her dea...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 659, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... to his lover before her death since he didnt finish the construction in time; such a...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...night the tower is much less crowded. With all being said, whether the tour gu...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, well, while, for example, for instance, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2000.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79616306954 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64509806476 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532374100719 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.1344086022 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 107.520120856 48.9658058833 220% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 166.666666667 100.406767564 166% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.75 20.6045352989 169% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.45110844103 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0666987808267 0.236089414692 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.028697029509 0.076458572812 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347400564303 0.0737576698707 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0512471286727 0.150856017488 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269683786756 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 11.7677419355 158% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.0537634409 155% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.247311828 185% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.