Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The extended family (grandparents, aunt, uncle, cousins) now is less important than it was in the past.
lifestyle today has been altered dramatically compared to the past. Among the most significant changes is the evanescence of extended families. In my opinion, this is witnessed as such a family is no longer catering to humans' requirements. Analysing how new ways of living obviate the needs for extended families will substantiate this.
Firstly, one obsolete role of an extended family was taking care of new-born babies, a vital task, and this responsibility is taken by daycares nowadays. children are taken care of by these institutions for they are staffed with well-trainded teams; babies start developing skills such as painting and potters by attending daycares, a fabulous headstrat for endulging in arts after they grow up. this clear advantage could not have been seen had the same task been given to grandparents.
long ago, a considerable significance of extended families was the economical lifestyle achieved by sharing expenses. For example, a large group of people would share the same house and use less electricity and thus save more money. However, these days most counties are experiencing a more affluent life which does not require such considerations.
On the other hand, an extended family can yet be cherished since it probably gives the children an opportunity to know about the families' values such as religious beliefs. As evident, grandparents, when living with young people, revitalise such old traditions. The problem with this benefit is that the value of sticking to old traditions is no longer embraced by experts as it is likely to trigger arguments leading to serious battles.
In summary, the merits of living in an extended family, such as financial support and helping with children's upbringing, are eclipsed by the modern lifestyle. Accordingly, an extended family is no longer as important as it used to be. Predictable, extended families will be even more forgotten in the foreseeable future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lifestyle
lifestyle today has been altered dramatically com...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 338, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tended families will substantiate this. Firstly, one obsolete role of an extende...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Children
...sibility is taken by daycares nowadays. children are taken care of by these institutions...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Long
...same task been given to grandparents. long ago, a considerable significance of ext...
^^^^
Line 4, column 350, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h does not require such considerations. On the other hand, an extended family ca...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, firstly, however, if, so, thus, well, for example, in summary, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 309.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29773462783 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99098466302 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611650485437 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1106007335 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.3125 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3125 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169035245402 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057835773404 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337405579002 0.0737576698707 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0950664050578 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232020210043 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.