Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The teacher is an essential part of the education process. They cannot be supplanted with other resources such as internet or textbooks. Moreover, the professor brings his or her expertise to the classroom and gives the unique part of university education. His or her experience needs to be acknowledged, I believe one of the ways to appreciate their contribution is with increasing their salary thus I agree with the statement because several reasons I would like to elaborate in the next paragraph.
Firstly, the increased salary will provide the student with less fatigue professor. What I mean is, the professors will unlikely works at different universities hence the professor will less tire. Therefore, he or she will spend more time to assist the student in the campus. They will be able to help the tutor process or give additional class. Moreover, the professor will more energetic while he or she teach thus the student will more excited to learn. In the end the quality of education will improve.
Secondly, the higher salary also encourages the professor to provide better service to the student. They will teach wholeheartedly and more tentative. For example, a professor who gets low income will not exonerate the material to an apathetic student since they believe it is not worth the effort. In the other hand, with a higher salary, the professor feel responsible to provide more service to the student hence he or she will try to gain the attention of the student. The student will gain more comprehensive knowledge and graduate with a better skill.
Lastly, the salary will encourage the professor to become a prolific researcher. It is a fact that the more research published in the prestigious scientific journals will boost the university accreditation. Especially, the research which leads to the invention of avant-garde material or theory. Additionally, the accolade that the professor gains also make the university more famous thus more student. For example, an international student will choose a university with numerous Nobel laureates and well-known professor than the one with least famous names. The more research also augments the education process, encourage the student to do gold standard research and practice their analytical thinking.
Ultimately, the money spent for the professor will benefit the student, the university, and the scientific world. All the things considered, I believe it is necessary to increase the professor salary for better education quality.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'teaches'.
Suggestion: teaches
...sor will more energetic while he or she teach thus the student will more excited to l...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 536, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the least'.
Suggestion: with the least
...s and well-known professor than the one with least famous names. The more research also au...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, i mean, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2120.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90171931792 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 672.3 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 16.0 3.08781362007 518% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.3619313321 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1739130435 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3913043478 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91304347826 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108170077965 0.236089414692 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373908596051 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0322702569696 0.0737576698707 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0705869227975 0.150856017488 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403499517639 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.