Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When people solve problems as a group, they come up with better solutions that if they were to try to solve the problem individually. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In this era of contemporary living, people must blend with others in the society to make their life sustainable. Yes, I would say it is better to make our decisions in group, but it totally depends on the situations we are in. The following paragraph will aptly substantiate views from my perspective in next paragraph.
Groups are the prominent and essential factors in most of the sources, such as Industries, Government, Organizations etc., For instance, the representatives (Group members) are the backbone of an elected party in a government. Every decision taken after gathering and brainstorming the representatives ideas, which highly advance the country's status and economic growth. Though, it was one person who is responsible for a country, but his decision also represents the team behind him. Each Person has different perspective of views and ideas, involving every point, will lead us to better solution than individual's solution which will be tentative or unreliable to go ahead. The recent statistical data also shows that groups have the higher advantage of having a better solution than the individual's solution for a problem.
Furthermore, team collaboration and working together finds better solutions, that has been proven by the health and medical organizations. One of the fact, due to the creation of advanced technologies, it is not only the environment being affected, it also affects the people with many diseases. To overcome this, the scientists and the doctors have to build team for their research. The team members offer their support and propose solution which was finalized then. This proves the strength of the team solution.
Indeed, group provides better solution, but this works on the basis of the situation. For Example, In case of an emergency, a person must take an action to save another persons life, it is not necessary to wait for a group discussion or an approval from someone else. Without hesitation, he should go ahead for the next move to make that person's condition stable.
To sum it up, Keeping in mind about the time and the situation, the groups deliver better solution for a problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In this era of contemporary living, peop...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...from my perspective in next paragraph. Groups are the prominent and esse...
^^^
Line 3, column 795, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ge of having a better solution than the individuals solution for a problem. Furt...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he individuals solution for a problem. Furthermore, team collaboration a...
^^^
Line 6, column 170, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...son must take an action to save another persons life, it is not necessary to wait for a...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o make that persons condition stable. To sum it up, Keeping in mind ab...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, then, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1808.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 349.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18051575931 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92550564225 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573065902579 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8579809311 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.352941176 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5294117647 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23529411765 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129299720474 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420310761991 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433295774436 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.082826166385 0.150856017488 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419514982035 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.