Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There are myriad factors or considerations which take into account that to work solely on the projects are beneficial than with partners. As far as I am concerned, according to the following reasons and some of my personal experience, I am of the conviction that pupils learn more when they work together. Someone can consciously weigh the pros and cons of each side. The reasons will be explored in the following essay.
The first exquisite reason which gives adherence to my viewpoint is related with experience. Students learn various things by working together. My experience is a good example of this. In my school days, I was a very shy girl. I often don't like to talk to other. When my teacher gave a chemistry group project and divide the class into four group, five members in each group. At starting, I feel nervous to work with the team member, but after few days I feel comfortable with them. I gave the idea for the project and many of the students became good friends of mine. It was a great experience for me. Moreover, in group works, pupils can share their thoughts to their partners, and they can make good friends for the lifetime by working together.
Apart from the fact mentioned above, one should regard another subtle point meticulously that is pertaining to obtaining huge experiences. The noteworthy refreshing intelligible statistics, revealed by a recent social research conducted in my country show that the majority of people agree that they learn more effectively by working with others. To shed more light on the issue, according to the result of the study done in Delhi university, a lot of students allocate their valuable time in working with other students. It enhances their interaction with other students and they do well on their research paper when they assign to work in groups.
Admittedly, someone may have justifications that by working alone give them more freedom. They can bring their idea for the project. They did not have to depend on others for the work. Working in groups is like a two-edged sword: on the one hand, by working with others give more thought for the project, on the other hand, students should have to dependent on others for their work.I still affirm that working with others give more benefit than alone.
In summary, by all aforementioned reasons, one can infer that working with others are more suitable than work solely. Pupils can learn a variety of things from others.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. 73
- TPO-09 - Integrated Writing Task 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use specific reasons and examples to supp 75
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use specific reasons and examples to supp 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
...ol days, I was a very shy girl. I often dont like to talk to other. When my teacher ...
Line 7, column 384, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
...e to dependent on others for their work.I still affirm that working with others g...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, moreover, so, still, well, apart from, i feel, in summary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2038.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 418.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87559808612 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58766756804 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511961722488 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.9205492483 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.9166666667 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4166666667 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04166666667 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355941887282 0.236089414692 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968593867696 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768863358178 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207965760579 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393145512299 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.