I agree with the statement. I think that in this century young people do not help communities like before. In my view, this happens because of the following reasons.
First, society makes people become alone. It encourages them to be materialistic. It learns people that they should expect the worldly benefit for all of the works which they do for others. As a consequence, helping others is not a value for people. Also, relationship with family members reduces so children do not see these behaviors between their family members and it is natural that they will not do it when they become adult.
Second, these days some of the young people are selfish. they just think about their needs and goals. they imagine themselves in high positions in their work so they just want to try more to get goals. In this situation, young people can not think about others benefits and situation.
Third, as they have big goals for themselves, they become too busy. They do not have any time to help others. They can just think about their family, not a bigger community.
Forth, as population growth and big cities were generated, people become stranger to each other. So, they can not consider others problems because they do not know them.
Finally, in past, money was not an important factor for people but now they think that everyone who has more money he will enjoy life more. They think that wealthy persons are happier because they have a better home, car, entrainment and etc. In this situation, people want to get more money and money become one of the most important goals for everyone. As a consequence, they look at time as a necessary tool for getting money and they are not ready to spend it for other people.
As a conclusion, changing society is the most important factor to change the values and characters of people so they do not give enough time to helping communities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 92, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to people'
Suggestion: to people
...ges them to be materialistic. It learns people that they should expect the worldly ben...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 147, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...y should expect the worldly benefit for all of the works which they do for others. As a co...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... they become adult. Second, these days some of the young people are selfish. they just thi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...s some of the young people are selfish. they just think about their needs and goals....
^^^^
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...just think about their needs and goals. they imagine themselves in high positions in...
^^^^
Line 6, column 10, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...ecause they do not know them. Finally, in past, money was not an important factor for ...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 234, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...ey have a better home, car, entrainment and etc. In this situation, people want to get m...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, look, second, so, third, i think, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 329.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73860182371 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40415348752 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495440729483 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.0 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5189477154 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.8636363636 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9545454545 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.40909090909 5.45110844103 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.53405017921 154% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15667962595 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638813637781 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645861883328 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108607521949 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657773028668 0.0645574589148 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 11.7677419355 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 58.1214874552 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.1575268817 63% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.62 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.