Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
I disagree with this opinion definitely. The world has been changing to a village! This is that point which cause negative beliefs about youths. Older people, especially with 2 or more generational gap, can not perceive this fact. This change has resulted in considerable differences between young people (specially teenagers) and their former dynasty. Older people thinks that communications should happen in that way, they had done. Contacting friends, folks face to face, writing letters, taking photo and buying a hard copy of it, talking by phone and ringing your folks’ bell regularly!. Young people prefer to make conversation by chatting, for instance, on Skype, Telegram, Whatsup, and etc. The internet has made a platform to accelerate human’s diary and improve social communications. Social media play an important role for building relationships and even businesses.
By the way, it can not be ignored that living in this manner, have some bad side effect; But does not mean there is no interest among young people to expand influential connections with friends and community. Young people are helping humanity and at the next step their specific community with thinking critically and working efficiently. They will be working harder than former people and will have made better world by the time!. In other word, they are to use all of facilities to drawing a utopia with the best amenities. They create noticeable changes in the world, by a computer and smart phone from home and flat. All of them, are on the verge of discovering mysteriouses of creation but based in home. So elderly people will not see their efforts and digging up knowledge barriers. All due respect, our parents and mentors should revise their attitude about young people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 694, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
... instance, on Skype, Telegram, Whatsup, and etc. The internet has made a platform to acc...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, for instance, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 286.0 407.700716846 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19230769231 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74429197462 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.657342657343 0.524837075471 125% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.914065061 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3529411765 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8235294118 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.17647058824 5.45110844103 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.53405017921 44% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152906608543 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0463140352931 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463509476435 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11731224837 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252036912064 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.