Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
I am absolutely agreed. Communicating with electronic gadgets like smart phones, computer based chatting and e-mail are useful to have a short conversation or greating. Unfortunately, several misunderstanding have been occured during different years; I mean the main goal of such technologies has not been holding meetings or for example, arranging a team work. There are several reasons to support my opinion as follows:
A project is an important task which demands deep contraction and, not just multimedia communication. According to some academic researches that I have studied, dealing with people, regardless what subject it is about, could be more effective if the people contact each other directly and physically! As a paradigm, remote educating is not as effective as teaching or learning in a classroom with your classmates. Because, the student would be in a scientific atmosphere and would feel a specific motivation to learn more. In contrast, educating via online classes, would not transfer that motivation. However, coordinating a project through e-mail is not a good idea since, the team work atmosphere and its other spiritual aspects are omitted dramatically.
There might be some subjects that makeing the colleagues aware of them, is not possible in a letter because, people will fed up when they have to type a long manuscript. Moreover, they might ignore interacacies of the project to make the letter shorter than it would, which leads to enormous problems. As an anology, the relationship between the letter's length and the author neural capacity, is the same with the relationship between the time which a preasoner spends in a jail!
Of course, there are some benefits of that method. For instance, people could get oriented about their task in the prject, when they are in different places of the world or the cities which are far from each other. I think the bad consequences of this method are more then its benefits.
All in all, I prefer to contact my colleagues face to face. Being in touch with e-mail, not only would not result in a valuable completed project, bt also would ruined the main target of it. People should take advntages of e-mail in other subjects, but not at a team work.
- a research on a fossil which has some signs of remaining the animal blood 60
- Experience is the best teacher 90
- Integrated writing task 1 TPO 34 3
- TPO 52 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'feed'
...ssible in a letter because, people will fed up when they have to type a long manusc...
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'letters'' or 'letter's'?
Suggestion: letters'; letter's
...n anology, the relationship between the letters length and the author neural capacity, ...
Line 4, column 268, Rule ID: COMP_THAN
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
...ad consequences of this method are more then its benefits. All in all, I prefer to ...
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'ruin'
...luable completed project, bt also would ruined the main target of it. People should ta...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, then, for example, for instance, i mean, i think, in contrast, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1861.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 367.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07084468665 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88900818627 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58583106267 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.6611926418 48.9658058833 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.3125 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9375 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186999918964 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515107971345 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345250699063 0.0737576698707 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0931597565648 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0160168117614 0.0645574589148 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.