Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Since time immemorial, communication has played a prominent role in each society's success. People are in quest of discussing a variety of subjects in order to provide a better solution to their problem. A controversial question which is often raised regarding this idea is whether a better result of a group project will be o gain through in person meeting or e-mailing. From my perspective, it is a prudent course of action to have an eye-to-eye meeting in order to attain an appropriate solution. In the following paragraphs, I will substantiate my viewpoint.
The first vital point to bear in mind is conveying by nonsense texts are vulnerable to misconception and misunderstanding. On the other hand, when you meet your group who are working with each other, you can discuss about ins and outs of your perspective using body languages, a wide range of gestures, eye contact, different voice tone, and so forth to impart your favorable concept, By enlisting helping hand of all of which one can impart their opinion clearly and with remarkable ease and as a definite result when all members of a group are thoroughly aware of other opinions as well as themselves, they can take proper measures to have a productive result and to head to their mutual goal.
The second noteworthy reason is that when members gather in a meeting to talk about their projects and the procedure which they should pass, they can find out what is going on with each member by observing their faces. Psychologically speaking, one's emotions are recognizable through their faces. It is plausible that some members owing to their introverted personality do not possess the ability to convey what they are really thinking of and just let it go; however, their face and gestures reflect their thinking caps. Being conscious about other's reactions when one is pinpointing their viewpoint can inform them to clarify and more elaborate their notion. There is no disguising the fact that when everybody is cultivated their brains by other's opinions, they can have a more reliable course of action, which ends up taking a more decisive decision which is covering the group's aim.
To wrap it up, based on the aforementioned grounds, one can draw a conclusion that contacting face-to-face is more beneficial for managing a group project. First, it will prevent misunderstanding and conflict between members. Second, members can observe other's emotions through watching their faces and know what is going on in their mind. It is highly recommended for groups to handle a project through group meetings instead of sending e-mails.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 246, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... their faces. Psychologically speaking, ones emotions are recognizable through their...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, really, regarding, second, so, well, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2175.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 430.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05813953488 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88645875286 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56511627907 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 658.8 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 117.747860251 48.9658058833 240% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 135.9375 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163805164383 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520036576435 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447431100872 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100147746619 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00593727458784 0.0645574589148 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 11.7677419355 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.