Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Drivers have to pay a fee for driving in busy city streets when there is a great amount of traffic. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
In contemporary era, people are plagued with their occupied life. By galloping rate of technology development, rarely do people experience a sense of relief during their routine life. Therefore, authorities are in quest of providing their people with easier life and offering their helping hand to them to overcome the city life hurdles. A controversial question which is often raised regarding this idea is whether it is a prudent course of action that government ask drivers extra charge for driving in streets with dense traffic. From my perspective, I believe it is a rational approach. In following paragraphs, I will substantiate my viewpoint.
The first vital point to bear in mind is that it is a moral task to preserve the planet earth and its resources for posterity. Environment have been at the edge of a catastrophe by irresponsible manner of humans specially city dwellers. Human activities poses a threat to the planet earth and has resulted in air pollution, soil erosion, elimination of biodiversity and so forth. Charging people with extra fee can bring about a positive impact on environment. The less people drive their private vehicle, the less air will be contaminated. Moreover, on this case people will be more incline to use public transportation, which will escalate the dense traffic in a great extent. Some opponent of this method may asserts that there is a poor foundation of public transportation for people and dictating people to pay a fee not only will not solve the problem, but also will intensify the detrimental effects of the heavy traffic. On the other hand, I firmly contend that by increasing people tendency toward using public transportation system, the authorities will pay a painstaking attention and put more emphasis to provide the required infrastructures to facilitate people’s daily life.
The second noteworthy reason is that according to hustle and bustle of people’s hectic lifestyle barely do they are incentivized enough to take care of their health and dedicate some time for exercising. By obliging people to pay the fee, a tremendous number of citizens will have a penchant to ride a bicycle, which is a golden opportunity for them to maintain their health and avoid obesity which is a common problem in city life that could attributed to an inordinate number of diseases. Moreover, there is no disguising the fact that, by biking every day to work, each individual can embark on day freshly and an obvious result his or her efficiency will increase in the course of time. Having said that, by looking to the bright side of the issue everybody will take advantage of imposing fee in certain occasions.
To wrap it up, based on aforementioned grounds one can drew a conclusion that paying extra money for travelling on certain roads could be beneficial in many ways. First, it will mitigate the problem of air pollution. Second, a healthier society will be resulted. Consequently, it is highly recommended to authorities to impose a fee to some roads to have a better country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 466, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...t a positive impact on environment. The less people drive their private vehicle, the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, look, may, moreover, regarding, second, so, therefore, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2551.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 503.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07157057654 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99796314909 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 278.0 212.727598566 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55268389662 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 814.5 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.4263388702 48.9658058833 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.954545455 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8636363636 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156460472628 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0434411075067 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333420525178 0.0737576698707 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0936356784079 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215262297572 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 86.8835125448 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.