Do you agree or disagree with the statement?
All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what
field they study in.
Since time immemorial, education has played a prominent role in each individual's life. Universities’ authorities are in quest of adopting policies to improve students' educational aspects of life. A controversial question which is often raised regarding this idea is whether it is a prudent course of action that university obliges students to take history courses or not. from my perspective, it is not beneficial for students to be required to take history courses. in the following paragraphs, I will substantiate my viewpoint.
The first vital point to bear in the mind is that learning history is a really demanding task which requires an inordinate amount of attention, time and energy. According to students’ hectic daily schedules, it may put a great strain on them. Moreover, lots of students, especially the ones who study engineering majors, are plagued with a dearth of trained memory and as a result, they have to put a lot of time and effort to memorize all the names and locations which usually all historical context contain. Besides, time is an immense asset for each youngster, that considerable time that could be invested in learning hands-on experiences and major-related software, will be wasted on an irrelevant course which has not a positive impact on their specialties. However, by learning relevant stuff about their major, they can be more adept in their field of study and this will culminate in landing a better job in the future, which is a building block of their prosperity in their life.
The second noteworthy reason is that learning history is not as fruitful as it said to be to adolescents. in the modern era, technology is developing at a galloping rate and almost all the concepts have been changed and become almost obsolete over the course of time.to shed light on the issue, thousands of years ago people were of the opinion that the earth is flat and it is so preposterous to us, a lot of other concepts sound ridiculous and irrational as well. Some contend that reading history leading to learning so much out of that and you can use ancient actions to know how to cope with problems pups up in your personal life. I find this idea absurd because I believe the type of problems nowadays human beings confront is far more perplexing than it used to be. Consequently, people cannot enlist ancient's people helping hand to deal with hustle and bustle of modern life.
To wrap it up, based on the aforementioned grounds, it is not beneficial for students to take history courses regardless of their major. First, it is so time-consuming. Second, it is not constructive in students’ life. Consequently, it is highly recommended for authorities to not obliged students to participate in such courses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ion has played a prominent role in each individuals life. Universities' authorities ar...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 378, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: From
...tudents to take history courses or not. from my perspective, it is not beneficial fo...
^^^^
Line 1, column 473, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...to be required to take history courses. in the following paragraphs, I will substa...
^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...uitful as it said to be to adolescents. in the modern era, technology is developin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, however, if, may, moreover, really, regarding, second, so, well, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2302.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 460.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00434782609 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01510062154 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54347826087 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 728.1 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.5199171864 48.9658058833 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.157894737 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2105263158 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57894736842 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22430630274 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065267966707 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531166191281 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137012586579 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356600613775 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.