TPO-49 - Integrated Writing Task
As it was stated in the reading passage, the author is of the opinion that humpback whales use stars to navigate through long distances that they migrate to. They provide 3 reasons to support their claim. On the other hand, the lecturer provides some arguments to refute their claim.
The first thing that the author noted is this specific kind of whale is intelligent enough to use stars for navigation in an attempt to justify their claim. On the contrary, the lecturer finds their idea lacking in terms of explanations. He asserts that there is no necessity to be any connection between intelligence and using stars as a means of navigation. To shed light on the issue, it has been proved that Ducks possess the ability to navigate according to stars' positions, nevertheless, they do not possess a high intelligence index. Therefore, there should not be any relation between ingenuity and using stars for the aim of navigation.
Another reason that the author provided was whales immigrating in straight lines and this is possible just when animals keep tracking an external object, which for whales is stars. Conversely, the lecturer finds the author's reasoning unconvincing. He mentioned that animals naturally use exotic objects for navigation. Scientists have revealed a study that indicates have some biomagnetic system in their brain which can sense the earth's magnetic fields and it is more likely that whales orient by the helping hand of their vulnerability to the earth's magnetic field rather than the stars.
As the last notion, the author emphasized by doing the behavior of spy-hopping they are in quest of stars’ position to navigate to their destination. Yet again, the lecturer refuses their idea. He noted that it is not relevant to the navigation. In order that sharks have this behavior too, while we know they do not migrate anywhere and just use the so-called behavior for the purpose of hunting.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 464, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'star'.
Suggestion: star
...ss the ability to navigate according to stars positions, nevertheless, they do not po...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, kind of, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 319.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.065830721 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70303792955 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526645768025 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.0708796707 49.2860985944 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9375 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363867103867 0.272083759551 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105231464161 0.0996497079465 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848873268291 0.0662205650399 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218811611095 0.162205337803 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383568742337 0.0443174109184 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.