In general, the critical decisions are determined by the old generation who takes control over national new policies or enterprises' development. The young generation seems to be insignificant in influencing the future of society. However, I dispute this statement and the following are the reasons for my standpoint.
For one thing, young people tend to be more sensible to social problems, such as unequal wealth distribution or land justice, and normally have courage to fight for their beliefs or causes. Compared to the elders, usually sticking to the rules and reluctant to change, the young generation dares to take to the streets to protest against authorities with their unyielding wills. As a result, their positive spirits can change the public's attitude and reverse the rigid situations. For instance, the Sunflower Student Movement in 2014 in Taiwan has substantially raised the public awareness of how the Taiwanese government manipulated the legislation regardless of different political attitudes people had.
For another, it is perceivable that some election strategies as well as recruitments of enterprises put great emphasis on the young generation. Many politicians and parties put forward innovative policies so as to appeal young people's attention as they participate in political activities more than before. Furthermore, many corporations are eager to hire fresh graduates due to their creativities and capabilities of utilizing new techniques. Some companies even publicize that they offer unlimited space and salaries above average wage in order to attractive talent fresh graduates. Apparently, the young generation plays crucial role in current society.
Undoubtedly, the final important decisions are generally made by the old generation; nevertheless, they are now inclined to abandon stereotypical notions, listening to advice from the young generation. Consequently, I believe that young people are increasingly influential to the whole society as they can make the future progress.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
..., their positive spirits can change the publics attitude and reverse the rigid situatio...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...parties put forward innovative policies so as to appeal young peoples attention as they ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, well, as to, for instance, in general, such as, as a result, as well as, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1725.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 301.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73089700997 4.8611393121 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15650286496 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.637873754153 0.524837075471 122% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0070289295 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.214285714 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 5.45110844103 211% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163964854432 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540118902294 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464850084986 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103124228994 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492966685292 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 58.1214874552 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 10.9000537634 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.61 8.01818996416 132% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.