Do you agree or disagree? It is impossible to always be completely honest with your friends.
Nowadays, there is a debate among people on whether it is better to be honest with your friends or not. I adamantly believe that it is not rational you pose your all walks of life for other people particularly your friends. That is because sometimes the friends become enemy of each other, moreover if you want to preserve your benefits, you should not talking about somethings.
First and foremost, all of us know that it is likely your friend become your enemy for any reason; therefore, when he knows somethings or weak points of your life, he maybe abuse from these points to annoying you. In other words, people do not spill their secrets to their friends that they exploit from these in critical situations. For example, when I was a student at a university, I had a friend that we were initimate with together. We had had a good friendship before we disputed about a insignificant matter. After this event, our relation become weak and weak untill he distributed my secrets to anybody and I was ashamed among other students. Consequently, person must never say their lifes to other people.
Moreover, if you want to be succesfull in some positions, you should not say something to your friends. In otherwise, friends are not trustable person, particularly when you are coworkers or classmates with each other. They maybe due to their benefits, utilizing from your weak points and make a situation for themselves; thus, it is a momentous principle that you maintain your weak points. For instance, my brother had worked at a company for ten years before their boss fired him. After several days, my brother investigated about the reasons of his rejecting, the boss said that his friends inform them from some his weak points. For these reasons we expel you and replace your friends.
As outlined above, we must save our secrets to avoiding from facing problems; hence, it is better that we do not spill our lifes to any person even our friends. That is owing to friends may be become our enemy one day, and for our benefits it is indispensable that conceal our weakness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 354, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'talk'
Suggestion: talk
... preserve your benefits, you should not talking about somethings. First and foremost, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 174, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'abuses'.
Suggestion: abuses
...s or weak points of your life, he maybe abuse from these points to annoying you. In o...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 492, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ood friendship before we disputed about a insignificant matter. After this event,...
^
Line 4, column 178, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'friend'.
Suggestion: friend
...rson even our friends. That is owing to friends may be become our enemy one day, and fo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, talking about, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 77.0 43.0788530466 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1720.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 360.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77777777778 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57954321729 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491666666667 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 528.3 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1152144312 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.176470588 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1764705882 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201442626781 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784955203839 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745867433567 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139699949181 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0786184986877 0.0645574589148 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.