Do you agree or disagree: The rapid growth of cities has a mostly positive impact on the development of the society.
With the dramatic development of the economy, numerous villages have turned into cities. Recently, there is a heated debate on the influence of cities' fast growth on the the society. As for me, I believe that the fast growth of cities has an advantageous effect on the development of the society, especially considering the benefits of social stability and technological advancement.
To start with, with the economic growth of cities, some homeless people could be employed and have a place to live, which will largely lead to a stable society. In detail, the government needs to build considerable infrastructure, and this provides plenty of jobs for vagrants. Take my hometown Chongqing for example, ten years ago, Chongqing used to have a great number of homeless people who wandered on the streets with nothing to do. Once I saw two tramps fighting just over a piece of bread that had been thrown on the ground, and because of these people as well as the street fight, residents were afraid to go out for a walk at night. Recently, with the city's improvement, many facilities like power stations, subway, railway, and airports have been required, so the lack of labor force gives these homeless people a chance to have a reliable job and be able to support their life. As a result, fewer people are living on the street, and people are not scared of going out at night, which creates a safe and stable social environment. This turns the society into a more beautiful place of harmony and stability.
What is more, urban development enables the better application of technological achievements in life. To be more exact, this allows the government to make use of its abundant resources and manpower to create innovative products and tools to make our lives more comfortable and convenient. For instance, these days, people who are living in the city find it convenient when make payments. Once, I was in a hurry to buy breakfast on my way to school, and I just realized that I forgot to take cash with me when I was about to pay. Fortunately, with mobile payment on my phone, I only needed to scan it to pay successfully, which not only avoided my embarrassing situation but also let me never worry about forgetting to bring cash again. Clearly, the technological improvement generated by city growth has fundamentally changed people's way of living.
Admittedly, there do exist some factors that can contribute to the opposing viewpoint, because this would generate some environmental pollution problems. However, as long as the public's awareness of environmental protection is cultivated, recyclable materials are used, and relevant environmental policies are introduced, pollution will no longer be an obstacle. Therefore, in general, the development of cities has more advantages than disadvantages for the development of the society.
In conclusion, after weighing all the related factors, I am confident to maintain that the rapid growth of cities has a mostly positive impact on the development of the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... the influence of cities fast growth on the the society. As for me, I believe that the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... the influence of cities fast growth on the the society. As for me, I believe that the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...ution problems. However, as long as the publics awareness of environmental protection i...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, well, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in general, as a result, as well as, to start with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 52.1666666667 150% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2533.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 500.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.066 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96392375071 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 274.0 212.727598566 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 810.0 618.680645161 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.0885070904 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.65 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.95 5.45110844103 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16809209386 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555104871988 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760009936434 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130546326432 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106150928957 0.0645574589148 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 86.8835125448 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.