Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rapid growth of cities has a positive impact on the development of the society.
Nowadays, all cities certainly rapidly grow up by improving industries and technologies. While some people consider that this significant change gives a positive impact on the development of society, some think that it will be almost all a negative impact. In my view, the rapid growth the cities make a negative impact on the development of our life. It causes global warming, a lack of growth of children, and limited food source.
To begin with, global warming will occur to promote our cities rapidly. There are several reasons why global warming will happen. One of the most momentum reasons is to emit toxic gas by a lot of industries, cars, and public transportations, and so on. Generally speaking, people often consider building many industries to enhance the quality of their life. Therefore, the temperature gradually increases by the idea of what people want to improve the quality of their life.
Secondly, the growth of children will be limited when our cities quickly grow up. Some local governments make decisions to create new apartments, facilities, and hospitals for their demand. In this choice, they sometimes diminish bountiful parks in their area for these constructions. As a result, many children have to stay at their residences with technologies such as games, smartphones, and computers because they cannot play outside with their friends because of new buildings.
Finally, the speedy growth of cities will make the consequence of lack of food. In a developed city, plenty of people settle due to markedly convenient public transportations, enough education for their children, and kindly health insurance. Moreover, it is so easy for them to establish their food. However, they obscure face lack of food by the number of people. Hence, the situations where people become famine will arise through the development of their cities.
To sum up, the negative impact will cause by rapidly grown cities. I surely believe that it triggers global warming, the inadequate growth of children, people’s famine.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, such as, as a result, in my view, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1724.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 326.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28834355828 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8095681301 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558282208589 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6034151412 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165277897427 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526343095348 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601388888255 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101036608158 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727411409338 0.0645574589148 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.