Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Parent should limit the hours that children spend on digital products besides schoolwork.
Several families make children so strict about their habitats in the house. While some parents save the time of using digital products for their children, some persuade their children to consume their time on utilizing technological products. It is so controvertible for them to decide the specific answer. In my view, they should control the time of children’s digital products. Their children split their time to hang out with their friends, devote other hobbies, and concentrate on their studies from school.
To begin with, playing with friends instead of with technology will be one of the benefits for children. In school, almost all students are willing to talk and play sports with their friends. From these actions, they can build up their communication skills. Even after they graduate from their school and retire their careers, they have to keep receiving this technique because the most vital experience of people is a conversation with someone. However, in an early stage of life, if people waste most of their free time playing games, they will not acquire ample communication skills against their future life. Therefore, parents should confine the time of using digital commodities for their children.
Secondly, children focus on other hobbies to not consume their time in front of digital products in their homes. After students go back into their houses, they select to play their hobbies such as sports, card games, and technologies, and so on. They do not accelerate their physical advantages to play games with digital products. Nevertheless, there is merit for their heath when they play baseball with their friends at the park near their houses. Take myself as an example, I played baseball soon after becoming a freshman in high school. Then, I was the fattest boy in school. From this experience, I could lose my weight and grow the highest height. As a result, young students should inhibit their free time from exploiting technologies.
Finally, young people focus on their school study by hindering from making use of technologies by their parents. They are capable of separating their time of smartphones or television programs into their homework from the schools. If they consume their free time to watch videos from their computers in their house, it is not enough for them to finish their thesis essays or prepare for their final exams. In the worst case, they fail their classes and drop from their school. On the other hand, if they do not spend their time playing games with their friends on the internet, they hold plenty of time to write details of their essays or to review their lectures for their final exams. Hence, children should not take their free time on digital products.
To sum up, parents should be harsh to not play digital products for children. I surely believe that children can earn three benefits such as more playing with their friends, devoting other interests, and making attention to their school studies.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, such as, as a result, in my view, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 71.0 43.0788530466 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 52.1666666667 153% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2491.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 491.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0733197556 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45910972583 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474541751527 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 709.2 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2740651984 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2592592593 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1851851852 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14814814815 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10617553041 0.236089414692 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550089775002 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643202084319 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.099836647173 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420728153483 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.