Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Nowadays, it is not important for people to have regularly family meals together.
In modern society, there are various definitions to eat family meals together. Some people consider that it is not significant for them to share family meals together. On the other hand, I definitely believe that having meals with family is essential. They can give others a piece of advice about their concerns, expand their ideas by a bunch of talks, and ease their feelings by the enjoyment of meals.
To begin with, people would be able to provide others with advice to make an opportunity for family meals together. Each member of a family sometimes obtains a fair amount of problems. While there are so many situations to talk about the topic with classmates or colleagues, they may not iron out the difficulties. However, family members acquiring different hints compared with friends or workmates can solve these problems. Thus, people permanently should create a chance to eat family meals with each other for assistance from family.
Secondly, constructing a situation to eat family meals swells ideas each person has. In a house, each person builds up an owned personality by alternative backgrounds. For example, my friend goes to a local high school, while his parents studied at an urban high school. It is a totally different style of education between these schools. They could discuss the differences in a family meal. As a result, they would acquire new knowledge about the merits and demerits of each school. Therefore, family meals are pivotal roles for people.
Finally, people comfort their mind by food with family frequently. Some people feel exhausted by tedious tasks in a company and assignments from a school. Nevertheless, they can easily forget about the feeling through family meals. For instance, they do not need to talk about remaining works they have to complete in the home. Talking about various topics with family makes them relieve tired body and mental. Consequently, it is momentous for people to eat family meals with each other.
To sum up, sharing tons of time with family by meal is necessary. I am sure that people can produce advice together, inflate the ideas each person attains, and relax their frustrated feelings.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, talking about, as a result, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 358.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08379888268 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60181099046 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550279329609 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.0795844833 48.9658058833 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.8333333333 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9166666667 20.6045352989 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54166666667 5.45110844103 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266597945535 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0953586466703 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753052604433 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170326479054 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518452827896 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.59 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.