Doing which activity do you think can better help you strengthen the friendship between you and your friend?
-having a good time together with your friend
-solving your friend’s problem with him or her
Strong bands between people come from various situations. While some people have a good time together with a friend, others solve problems obtained by their friends with him or her. It is so controvertible for them to determine a specific conclusion. In my view, having a noble time with a friend helps strengthen the friendship between people. It results in an unforgettable memory, bountiful time to know each other, and want to hang out again.
To begin with, spending a good time with friends establishes an unforgettable recollection of the friendship between them. When people hang out with others, they decide to go shopping, hiking, and playing sports outside, and so on. As a result, it is an enjoyable time for them to consume time with each other because they do not need concern on how to communicate with others and become natural behavior toward others. Moreover, once they earn ample comments about clothes in shopping from a friend, their feeling satisfy pleasure. It creates an intimate relationship to spend time with their friend.
Secondly, people attain plenty of time to know each other for friendship by having a good time together with their friends. When people hang out with others, they have to devote time to stand by with each other. Therefore, it is enough time to gain much information such as hobbies, favorite food, and family structure, and so on. These contents boost their relationship because it is the best chance to connect their details with others. Thus, they acquire a good friendship with each other.
Finally, devoting an immeasurable time with friends causes thought of what they want to hang out again each other for better friendship. When people consider that they have a good time with their friends, it sometimes results in hanging out with each other again. This thought only comes from pleasure or happiness by the time with their friends. On the other hand, if they conclude that they are not capable of spending a satisfying time with a friend, they will hesitate to call or ask again to go shopping or play sports.
To sum up, when people produce better friendships with others, they should consume an enjoyable time with a friend. I surely believe that they store a memorable memory, achieve adequate opportunity to know each other, and come up with a plan about hanging up again.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[3]
Message: Did you mean 'to concern'?
Suggestion: to concern
...ith each other because they do not need concern on how to communicate with others and b...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, while, such as, as a result, in my view, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1954.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94683544304 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5693097025 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470886075949 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 579.6 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3149346383 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0476190476 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8095238095 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2380952381 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268778299314 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116359460921 0.076458572812 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0968080050473 0.0737576698707 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197989687257 0.150856017488 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064809937082 0.0645574589148 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.