After making a presentation in class, you want to evaluate it. Which of the following do you think would be better for you?
1. Watch the recording by yourself.
2. Invite other to discuss and give opinions.
The way that people want to improve presentations is so diverse. While some consider that they look at the recording by themselves, others ask friends or coworkers about opinions and discuss them. It is so controvertible for them to determine a specific conclusion. In my view, people should invite others to discuss and give opinions if they want to progress the presentation. It would be several advantages such as feedbacks they cannot notice by themselves, intensive ideas each person has, and preparation for real presentation.
To begin with, others can notice some weak points for presentation to guide them to discuss it. People cannot acknowledge whether the presentation is good or bad only when they practice to watch by the recording. For example, if they have the confidence to explain something in the company in front of some executive members, it is difficult for them to understand it, and they may use their brains more wisely. They have to care about how these members do not utilize the brainstorming to understand. Their fellows definitely would be supportive of the feedback.
Secondly, giving colleagues or classmates an invitation to get feedback about presentations improves it as more various ideas. People are inclined to come up with confined ideas when they consider a bunch of materials for presentations by themselves. Therefore, the opinion they provide maybe not to be sophisticated. However, the presentation would be more easily understandable if they once try to rely on asking a piece of advice from fellows. Moreover, the listener would be convinced to say that the presentation is valuable.
Finally, people can ease the mental for presentation by an opinion from others. People sometimes feel nervous about talking about particular topics in front of a mountain of people. There is one solution to fix this problem. It would be that they practice it as a demonstration against a lot of other employees or friends because they can mistake all-time at the time. They can catch up with tips or confidence that they must be a success in a real presentation.
To sum up, people should ask for comments or talk about their presentations with others to deal with better presentations. I surely believe that they would acquire some benefits such as grabbing different aspects of it, developed viewpoints, the mindset to be ready for it.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, such as, talking about, in my view, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1992.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 389.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12082262211 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03303557334 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52442159383 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3302403465 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5454545455 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6818181818 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192638420392 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671888869622 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392915567022 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125697234983 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375989001785 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.