Do you agree or disagree Reading fiction such as novels and short stories is more enjoyable than watching movies

People have different perception about reading books and watching movies in their life. Some enjoy reading romantic and narrative books whereas other prefer to watch cinema for entertainment. Though, reading books may have many advantages but I really enjoy watching series in television. I am not concurred with the idea that people enjoy more reading novels. I will illustrate these ideas in the subsequent paragraph.

To begin with, human beings are arduous in capitalistic society and do not have time for socialize with family and colleagues. Moreover, most of the time is spend in official tasks. In this reason, if they get time, instead of reading books alone, movie is the best idea to have some refreshment and enjoy with dear and near one. I have to admit that my own opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. When I was working for an organization, I was quiet busy for baseline survey for identifying disabled children from community. Because of which I barely have time to relax and have fun with my friends. When I got time on Saturday then I used to invite my friends to watch television and make conversation with me. But it is not possible while reading. We need to concentrate on books to go through the content and story.

Secondly, visual images attract the mind and eyes of peoples from their verbal actions. Since, videos are available in the animated form, movies are substantially popular in the world to have some time from their hectic life. Advancement of technology made it possible to snatch the human attention towards screen than in books. For instance, modified version of movies like 3D, 6D are more interesting by which people can feel what they see in the screen. on the other hand, books may have included vague subject matter and you cannot skip it. On the other hand, movies are more scripted, and important scenes are included for the audience's concern so people should not feel monotonous.

Finally, watching movies is beneficial to do multiple tasks at a same time. For example, person can cook and watch movies in a parallel way. If they do not want to watch and only listen, it is possible to do so. On the contrary, it is not possible to do several works along with reading books because they have to only focus on and go with every word of it. According to this reason, people find reading more boring and time consuming and favor to share screen with their companions.

In light of the above mentioned reasons, I really find watching cinemas more fascinating than reading books as it has new automated technology, which does not make awful though, it may have some drawbacks. Virtually, most of the people intrigued to watch television because of the easy access, time consuming and possibility to do several duties in the same time.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...lleagues. Moreover, most of the time is spend in official tasks. In this reason, if t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 459, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...e can feel what they see in the screen. on the other hand, books may have included...
^^
Line 5, column 690, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n so people should not feel monotonous. Finally, watching movies is beneficial t...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a parallel way" with adverb for "parallel"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ample, person can cook and watch movies in a parallel way. If they do not want to watch and only ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, may, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, then, whereas, while, for example, for instance, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2351.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 485.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84742268041 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69283662038 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57637920989 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498969072165 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 738.9 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.534510869 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0740740741 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.962962963 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.96296296296 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197892035165 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604382437508 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05187245496 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134402388546 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581181193282 0.0645574589148 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.