Do you agree or disagree with the statement: It is better to finish a project completely and then do another project than do two or more projects at the same time.
It is a well-known fact that Caesar could do many things at once and a lot of people admired him. Indeed, doing several works simultaneously is quite efficient and can lead a person to success. Nevertheless, I think that it is better to finish a certain work completely, and only then begin another project. I will give some plausible examples to bolster my opinion.
Firstly, when we are engaged in one project, we are able to devote all our physical strength and intellectual efforts to doing the strides towards a goal. In contrast, even if the most energetic person would work on two projects at once, he/she cannot deliver the same level of proficiency to both of them. An employee has to think about lots of projects he has, making his target less vivid.
Secondly, doing more than one project at the same time would lower quality of work. We are subdividing our potential to many things, which can lead to serious problems. For example, if an executive tries to make a lot of projects, but their performance leaves much to be desired, then why should a supervisor reward such a inefficient work? This will affect salary and respect of colleges.
Thirdly, when we switch back and forth from one project to another, we damage the work flow. Ideas get confused and even fade away. Concentration on one type of work gets disrupted by the desire to manage everything. When a person begins a work, he must acknowledge that it will be better to do the best on one thing, and then go to the following.
What conclusion can be drawn from this? In my opinion, if person starts one project, he/she must complete it and bring to the supreme. Only then, the final execution can be rewarded and will give new strength and inspiration for subsequent projects, what will make them even more better.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...hen why should a supervisor reward such a inefficient work? This will affect sala...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, well, as to, for example, i think, in contrast, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 315.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70158730159 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61112606741 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596825396825 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0634178905 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2777777778 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.45110844103 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282481208934 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842516079863 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0943985730224 0.0737576698707 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163995551121 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525574440684 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.