Do you agree or disagree with the statement:It is better to make friends who are intelligent than with a good sense of humor.
Friends, the foundation of social life, has been valued and triggers a heated discussion over whether it is better to make friends who are intelligent than with a good sense of humor. It is not surprising that some people, if not majority, may therefore argued that to make intelligent friends is better, while in contrast, I disagree with it and it is my central argument that making friends who with a good sense of humor is better.
The first reason for my argument is that a friend who has a good sense of humor could reconcile more easily with another who has argument with him or her. This is because one who has a good sense of humor speaks with more quips and jests, which may quickly crack the embarrassment between them. For example, I have a harsh controversy with my best friend Tom about which programming language is the best in last year. I held the point that Python is the best because of its light-weight and powerful community while Tom thought C++ is the best because of its well structure, and we got a hot disputation so that we even refused to meet each other for three days. However, he melted the ice between us by a smart joke, which he said that we could create a new programming language which contained both advantages of Python and C++ together. In this case, without the humorous words, me and Tom would not reconcile as easily as then. That is to say, humorous friend could more easily to eliminate displeasure caused by argument.
What is more, humorous friend could help one get out of the depression. When one is in depression, one could be pessimistic and ineffective, and some jokes which made by humorous friend could alleviate that. For instance, my friend Jack got a last prize in the final exam at senior high school, which is making him dejected. His friend encouraged him that “either first prize or last prize are the no.1 except the sequence, what you have to do is to upside down that sequence”, which was cheer him up a lot. As a result, after a few mouths endeavor, Jack succeeded change the sequence of prize and got the first prize in subsequent final exam. If his friend had not given a humorous words when he failed in exam, possibly he might still in depression, and he could not rally in a second and get a superb performance in followed exam. Accordingly, this is the important reason for me to advocate that making friend with a good sense of humor is better.
Admittedly, there might be some possibilities that intelligent friend could be more helpful when working on some academic project. For example, when one is stuck with some problems in project, an intelligent friend may help to solve them, which will certainly make both happy. However, intelligent friend may be frank, which may render a misunderstanding.
To conclude, due to the reasons that a friend with a good sense of humor could reconcile more easily and help one get out of the depression, I have to maintain that making friends who with a good sense of humor is better.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 694, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'word'?
Suggestion: word
... If his friend had not given a humorous words when he failed in exam, possibly he mig...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 779, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ht still in depression, and he could not rally in a second and get a superb perfo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, however, if, may, second, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in contrast, as a result, what is more, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 34.0 11.0286738351 308% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2484.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 534.0 407.700716846 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65168539326 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80712388197 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64277263855 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.426966292135 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 756.9 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.5344189637 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.2 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 5.45110844103 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414540518665 0.236089414692 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144895170116 0.076458572812 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144916387459 0.0737576698707 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.293608444377 0.150856017488 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15646368124 0.0645574589148 242% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 58.1214874552 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.