technology designed to make our life simpler actually makes our life more complicated
With science and technology developing at breakneck speed, so much has become sophisticated and has made modern people convoluted. A heated discussion over the issue of whether technology designed to make our life simpler actually makes our life more complicated comes into the spotlight of the public. This article sets out to support my agreement with the statement with these following reasons.
In the first place, my priority point of view is that the overuse of certain technologies has made our life more complicated. Automobile technologies designed to make our life more convenient have brought us more serious side effects, the most significant one of which is the traffic jam. For example, the average speed of common automobiles on the highway can be over 120km per hour, which was supposed to save a large amount of time for people on the road when they were designed. However, what my sister, Lucy, is experiencing in Beijing is the traffic congestion, which is always so heavy that people need to spend about two hours covering 20 kilometers, especially during rush hours. Lucy's life has become less convenient because she has to get up 5 a.m. to make sure the she will not be late for work starting at 8:30 a.m. Every day sge comes back home at 9 p.m., so she does not even have the time to cook dinner by herself. This simple example has illustrated the complexity and inconvenience technology has brought, which was designed to make our life simpler at first.
What is more, the other viewpoint I would like to suggest is that a lack of law and regulations regarding technologies has caused complex problems. The environment pollution is another aspect that technology has made our life more complicated, in the name of making it simpler. It could be given a concrete example of plastic bag. When plastic bags were put into use, they did bring much convenience. People need not always take bags with themselves when they are going shopping because merchants would give them plastic bags for free, which were brought light and clean. However, without enough regulations, people threw them away anywhere, and there were even plastic bags being found in the stomachs of fish and whales. Plastic bags have caused serious water and soil pollution because it takes hundreds of years for them to decompose, which pose a threat to the food security and human health. That is why I maintain that technologies have made life more complicated rather than simpler.
Admittedly, someone holds an opposite opinion that technology has made communication more convenient, and thus contributes to a simpler life. For instance, with instant messaging programs such as MSN and QQ, the Internet has allowed people to talk to their friends who are far away from them for free. However, it has also led to all kinds of high-tech crimes, and poses great challenges to the police. In consequence, science and technologies are double-edged swords, which would always make our life more complicated.
In conclusion, judging from the demonstrations above, I would claim that the disadvantages of the development of technology far outweigh its advantages, which means technology designed to make our life simpler has actually made our life more complicated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
With science and technology developing a...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tatement with these following reasons. In the first place, my priority poi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 779, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'she'?
Suggestion: the; she
...e she has to get up 5 a.m. to make sure the she will not be late for work starting at 8...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to make our life simpler at first. What is more, the other viewpoint I woul...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore complicated rather than simpler. Admittedly, someone holds an opposite op...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ways make our life more complicated. In conclusion, judging from the demonstr...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, regarding, so, thus, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, what is more, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2724.0 1977.66487455 138% => OK
No of words: 538.0 407.700716846 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06319702602 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81610080973 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76647621327 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 281.0 212.727598566 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522304832714 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 837.9 618.680645161 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2200322049 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.818181818 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4545454545 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.483009206357 0.236089414692 205% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165631393369 0.076458572812 217% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.206859202192 0.0737576698707 280% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.343221280437 0.150856017488 228% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120471081176 0.0645574589148 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.