Do you agree or disagree with the statement:Nowadays it is not important for people to have regular family meals together.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the statement:

Nowadays it is not important for people to have regular family meals together.

Currently, with the development of technology, some individuals are employing numerous approaches to meeting their goals of family reunions. However, some individuals insist that it is still essential to have regular family meals together, which is irreplaceable in strengthening family bonds. As for this opinion, I cannot concur with it for the following reasons.
To start with, owing to the advancement of society, a large proportion of citizens are studying or working in other cities, or even provinces. Meanwhile, they also have to endeavor to maximize their working efficiency to achieve their goals or maintain self-sustainment. Therefore, they are already burdened with their own affairs, which deprive their free time to relax or refresh their mindsets. Under this situation, provided that they have to participate in the scheduled regular family meals, lots of time that can be utilized to relax is spent on their way home, which is likely to make them feel exhausted. Although they arrive at home on time, they are worn out and do not want to interact with their family members. Things may even go from bad to worse, their parents, due to their lack in experience of living in metropolises, they may put the blame on their children and ascribe their behaviors to the dearth of filial piety, which ends up exerting an adverse effect on their relationships. With the misunderstanding between each other, they are likely to get into a fight and the damages caused by the argument are not easy to patch up, which runs around they initial goals of reinforcing their family ties.
What’s more, arranging regular family meals also exhausts parents. Parents usually contend that their children enslaved by excessive workload are likely to enjoy the homemade delicacies. Plus, parents also think that children are not capable of taking care of themselves, thus they expend a long time to prepare for meals. To be more specific, they may work together to decide the cuisines. And then, based on their decisions on cuisines, they have to get up early to line up in different supermarkets to purchase fresh ingredients. After that, hours have to be spent on chopping the meat and washing vegetables, which, indeed, puts a strain on aging parents. Even when they finish the meals, out of parental love, they tend to wash the dishes and ask their children to watch TV. It is apparent that although parents are extremely tired, little they can spend with their children to have a genuine conversation, not to mention the accomplishment of the goals of strengthening the family relationships.
Admittedly, having regular family meals together does have some perks. Children can share their happiness and sorrows with their parents, which helps them to relieve their pressure. Meanwhile, parents are also capable of interacting with their children. However, the merits are negligible since all of these can be easily replaced by advanced technology. For instance, the video phone call also renders them opportunities to directly talk to each other to maintain their harmonious relationships. Plus, it also saves the time we have to expend on the way home, which is more economical and energy-saving.
In a nutshell, from what has been mentioned above, I have to reiterate my opinion that it is not essential for people to have regular family meals together. For one thing, it is exhausting for children working or studying in remote regions. For another, it also bothers parents since they have to work a lot for the preparation. Nevertheless, there are several approaches that are suitable to reinforce family bonds without much efforts, which are more wise alternatives for modern individuals.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 424, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...table to reinforce family bonds without much efforts, which are more wise alternativ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, then, therefore, thus, while, as for, for instance, for one thing, to start with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 103.0 52.1666666667 197% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3100.0 1977.66487455 157% => OK
No of words: 601.0 407.700716846 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15806988353 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.95129289623 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84964486505 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 297.0 212.727598566 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494176372712 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 960.3 618.680645161 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6552347356 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.714285714 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4642857143 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.60714285714 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202635186194 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740140042338 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760986365634 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162606795804 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0797401940179 0.0645574589148 124% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 150.0 86.8835125448 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.